Talk:0.14 - Revision history

Bwijn: Log bug in 0.14 /0.14.1 ?

2014-08-09T16:17:12Z

Log bug in 0.14 /0.14.1 ?

Syneil: /* Dithmengos */ new section

2014-01-15T13:01:06Z

‎Dithmengos: new section

MoogleDan at 13:15, 30 November 2013

2013-11-30T13:15:04Z

Bwijn: Just observations

2013-11-30T11:45:24Z

Just observations

New page

== Just observations ==
I've no proves but observed while playing trunk/014a at home that scrolls of acquirement seem to give much less 'true random' but mostly items of downgraded quality. Rarely ever you also find randarts which have not a least one very negative attribute (such as Str-5). This is not included in the 0.14 changelog up to now. What do you think about this? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 12:45, 30 November 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 9 August 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Any news about this new stealthy God? [[User:Syneil\|Syneil]] ([[User talk:Syneil\|talk]]) 14:01, 15 January 2014 (CET)		Any news about this new stealthy God? [[User:Syneil\|Syneil]] ([[User talk:Syneil\|talk]]) 14:01, 15 January 2014 (CET)
		+	:Yes, he is called [[Dithmenos]] now, and he is a very good choice for [[Assassin]]s. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 18:17, 9 August 2014 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Stats bias ==
		+	Citation "Repel and Deflect Missiles now expire on a per-deflection basis rather than being a duration." The new idea of 'Repel and Deflect Missiles' produces strange bias in stats log. If not continually stumbling upon bands of centaurs or yaktaurs your 'RMsl'-status effect is very longliving. The log respectively tells of very low counts of spell usage nowadays. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 18:17, 9 August 2014 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Log bug in 0.14 /0.14.1 ==
		+	I was surprised to notice that for unknown reasons the [[0.14.1]] game log (whose script default I didn't accustom) doesn't report the finding of [[unrands]] like [[Punk]] or [[Gauntlets of War]]. At the same game findings of [[randarts]] or [[rods]] were logged correctly. Anybody out there who's got an idea why? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 18:17, 9 August 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 15 January 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I've no proves but observed while playing trunk/014a at home that scrolls of acquirement seem to give much less 'true random' but mostly items of downgraded quality. Rarely ever you also find randarts which have not a least one very negative attribute (such as Str-5). This is not included in the 0.14 changelog up to now. What do you think about this? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 12:45, 30 November 2013 (CET)		I've no proves but observed while playing trunk/014a at home that scrolls of acquirement seem to give much less 'true random' but mostly items of downgraded quality. Rarely ever you also find randarts which have not a least one very negative attribute (such as Str-5). This is not included in the 0.14 changelog up to now. What do you think about this? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 12:45, 30 November 2013 (CET)
	:Bad luck on your part. On Tavern, I actually watched a thread where one of the devs convinced the others to scale the "average" enchantment bonuses of randarts up by +3, +3, and I know that I've certainly acquired plenty of excellent gear since 0.14 started. Sometimes the RNG just generates bad though... Keep at it; you'll get something good. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 14:15, 30 November 2013 (CET)		:Bad luck on your part. On Tavern, I actually watched a thread where one of the devs convinced the others to scale the "average" enchantment bonuses of randarts up by +3, +3, and I know that I've certainly acquired plenty of excellent gear since 0.14 started. Sometimes the RNG just generates bad though... Keep at it; you'll get something good. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 14:15, 30 November 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	== Dithmengos ==
		+
		+	Any news about this new stealthy God? [[User:Syneil\|Syneil]] ([[User talk:Syneil\|talk]]) 14:01, 15 January 2014 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:15, 30 November 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Just observations ==		== Just observations ==
	I've no proves but observed while playing trunk/014a at home that scrolls of acquirement seem to give much less 'true random' but mostly items of downgraded quality. Rarely ever you also find randarts which have not a least one very negative attribute (such as Str-5). This is not included in the 0.14 changelog up to now. What do you think about this? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 12:45, 30 November 2013 (CET)		I've no proves but observed while playing trunk/014a at home that scrolls of acquirement seem to give much less 'true random' but mostly items of downgraded quality. Rarely ever you also find randarts which have not a least one very negative attribute (such as Str-5). This is not included in the 0.14 changelog up to now. What do you think about this? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 12:45, 30 November 2013 (CET)
		+	:Bad luck on your part. On Tavern, I actually watched a thread where one of the devs convinced the others to scale the "average" enchantment bonuses of randarts up by +3, +3, and I know that I've certainly acquired plenty of excellent gear since 0.14 started. Sometimes the RNG just generates bad though... Keep at it; you'll get something good. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 14:15, 30 November 2013 (CET)