Talk:0.18 - Revision history

Edsrzf: /* noticed wrong statements */

2016-05-11T20:28:18Z

‎noticed wrong statements

Medar: /* noticed wrong statements */

2016-05-11T05:05:16Z

‎noticed wrong statements

Edsrzf: /* noticed wrong statements */

2016-05-10T21:26:12Z

‎noticed wrong statements

Bwijn: /* noticed wrong statements */ new section

2016-05-10T13:52:11Z

‎noticed wrong statements: new section

Bwijn: /* Remarks on 0.18 developments */ new section

2016-04-07T14:18:27Z

‎Remarks on 0.18 developments: new section

New page

== Remarks on 0.18 developments ==

I'm rather disappointed by the new ideas of the 0.18 developers. For example: random artifacts (BTW very rare) that destruct themselves when put aside ... horrible! The DCSS game takes a self-destructive course IMHO. I'll probably leave it if it comes even more so. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 16:18, 7 April 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 11 May 2016
Line 8:		Line 8:
	:They did, but those articles were automatically updated when [[Module:Table of monsters]] was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)		:They did, but those articles were automatically updated when [[Module:Table of monsters]] was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
	::It would be nice if content generated from data would include source version somehow. Of course it shouldn't take out much space. -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 07:05, 11 May 2016 (CEST)		::It would be nice if content generated from data would include source version somehow. Of course it shouldn't take out much space. -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 07:05, 11 May 2016 (CEST)
		+	:::Yeah, right now we're at this strange sort of in-between stage where most monster articles are actually up to date, but the version tags haven't been updated. I would like to improve the state of things somehow; I'm just not sure of the best approach. - [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 22:28, 11 May 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:05, 11 May 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have [[Conjure Flame]] in its spellset. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)		The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have [[Conjure Flame]] in its spellset. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
	:They did, but those articles were automatically updated when [[Module:Table of monsters]] was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)		:They did, but those articles were automatically updated when [[Module:Table of monsters]] was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
		+	::It would be nice if content generated from data would include source version somehow. Of course it shouldn't take out much space. -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 07:05, 11 May 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 10 May 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have [[Conjure Flame]] in its spellset. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)		The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have [[Conjure Flame]] in its spellset. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
		+	:They did, but those articles were automatically updated when [[Module:Table of monsters]] was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 10 May 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'm rather disappointed by the new ideas of the 0.18 developers. For example: random artifacts (BTW very rare) that destruct themselves when put aside ... horrible! The DCSS game takes a self-destructive course IMHO. I'll probably leave it if it comes even more so. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 16:18, 7 April 2016 (CEST)		I'm rather disappointed by the new ideas of the 0.18 developers. For example: random artifacts (BTW very rare) that destruct themselves when put aside ... horrible! The DCSS game takes a self-destructive course IMHO. I'll probably leave it if it comes even more so. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 16:18, 7 April 2016 (CEST)
		+
		+	== noticed wrong statements ==
		+
		+	The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have [[Conjure Flame]] in its spellset. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)