Talk:Attack flavour - Revision history

Tower: Call and response.

2014-07-24T17:39:47Z

Call and response.

MoogleDan: /* 22/07/2014 Update */

2014-07-24T14:25:00Z

‎22/07/2014 Update

Bwijn: /* 22/07/2014 Update */ +1

2014-07-23T22:11:57Z

‎22/07/2014 Update: +1

MoogleDan at 17:35, 22 July 2014

2014-07-22T17:35:07Z

Bwijn: still buggy?

2013-07-03T13:06:56Z

still buggy?

New page

I read "in an apparent bug, the higher the defender's life protection, the more likely it is to be drained". No version-info, so probably an old, no longer accurate info. Or is [[0.12]] still infested by this bug? What do others think about it? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 15:06, 3 July 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 24 July 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	::*'''Drain XP''' - Is this still the actual name of this flavour? It hasn't "drained XP" for a while now.		::*'''Drain XP''' - Is this still the actual name of this flavour? It hasn't "drained XP" for a while now.
	::--[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 16:25, 24 July 2014 (CEST)		::--[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 16:25, 24 July 2014 (CEST)
		+	:::Firebrand attacks also do regular fire damage (with the same formula as regular fire damage (sorry for forgetting to mention it), komodos did not lose the disease brand in 0.14 (and yes, the flavour is removed in 0.15, as the page has), and in-source "drain xp" is still the referred-to name for the attack flavour. Ambivalent about the page re-sort. --[[User:Tower\|Tower]] ([[User talk:Tower\|talk]]) 19:39, 24 July 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 24 July 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Now this, I like. Nicely done Tower. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 July 2014 (CEST)		Now this, I like. Nicely done Tower. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 July 2014 (CEST)
	:+1 Agree completely to Dan's congrats. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 00:11, 24 July 2014 (CEST)		:+1 Agree completely to Dan's congrats. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 00:11, 24 July 2014 (CEST)
		+	::I gave the page a once over, arranging the flavours more thematically (all the physical together, all the fire together, all the cold & water, etc. etc.). I think this is a little more sensible than separating elemental + effect from pure elemental, but if you disagree, I can reset it easily enough. I ''do'' have a few questions though about possible inaccuracies:
		+	::*'''Firebrand''' - Does this flavour not burn scrolls? I realize item destruction will be going away in a version, but it's a weird thing not to mention after including it in all the other fire damage sources. If the actual attack doesn't deal fire, though, I suppose it wouldn't...
		+	::*'''Disease''' - Komodos no longer have sickening bites, do they? Does anything else, or is this an obsolete flavour?
		+	::*'''Drain XP''' - Is this still the actual name of this flavour? It hasn't "drained XP" for a while now.
		+	::--[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 16:25, 24 July 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 23 July 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==22/07/2014 Update==		==22/07/2014 Update==
	Now this, I like. Nicely done Tower. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 July 2014 (CEST)		Now this, I like. Nicely done Tower. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 July 2014 (CEST)
		+	:+1 Agree completely to Dan's congrats. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 00:11, 24 July 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 22 July 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I read "in an apparent bug, the higher the defender's life protection, the more likely it is to be drained". No version-info, so probably an old, no longer accurate info. Or is [[0.12]] still infested by this bug? What do others think about it? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 15:06, 3 July 2013 (CEST)		I read "in an apparent bug, the higher the defender's life protection, the more likely it is to be drained". No version-info, so probably an old, no longer accurate info. Or is [[0.12]] still infested by this bug? What do others think about it? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 15:06, 3 July 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	==22/07/2014 Update==
		+	Now this, I like. Nicely done Tower. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 19:35, 22 July 2014 (CEST)