Talk:Battlesphere - Revision history

Fingolfin at 16:24, 12 April 2015

2015-04-12T16:24:22Z

CommanderC at 17:51, 18 April 2013

2013-04-18T17:51:30Z

MoogleDan at 14:36, 18 April 2013

2013-04-18T14:36:46Z

MoogleDan at 14:36, 18 April 2013

2013-04-18T14:36:37Z

MoogleDan: Reply to CommanderC

2013-04-18T14:36:06Z

Reply to CommanderC

CommanderC: Created page with "The monster template that appears on this page was generated by the bot. It did a pretty good job, but the fields which contain the resistances and vulnerabilities look a bit ugl..."

2013-04-18T13:42:21Z

Created page with "The monster template that appears on this page was generated by the bot. It did a pretty good job, but the fields which contain the resistances and vulnerabilities look a bit ugl..."

New page

The monster template that appears on this page was generated by the bot. It did a pretty good job, but the fields which contain the resistances and vulnerabilities look a bit ugly, because the naming of the resistances and vulnerabilities is not uniform. I am not too sure which names we should be using. For example: rDrowning? Drowning? rConstrict? rConstriction?, ... I'm open to any suggestions. --[[User:CommanderC|CommanderC]] 15:42, 18 April 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:24, 12 April 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::The ordering will always be the same, and every two resistances the bot will insert a <nowiki><br></nowiki>. Your proposal looks quite good. After 0.12 is released, we should edit all the pages in [[:Category:Resistance]] and [[:Category:Vulnerability]] according to this naming convention. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 19:51, 18 April 2013 (CEST)		::The ordering will always be the same, and every two resistances the bot will insert a <nowiki><br></nowiki>. Your proposal looks quite good. After 0.12 is released, we should edit all the pages in [[:Category:Resistance]] and [[:Category:Vulnerability]] according to this naming convention. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 19:51, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+
		+	Just a quick question : can a battlesphere trigger traps? --[[User:Fingolfin\|Fingolfin]] ([[User talk:Fingolfin\|talk]]) 18:24, 12 April 2015 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 18 April 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 16:36, 18 April 2013 (CEST)		:Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 16:36, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	::The ordering will always be the same, and every two resistances the bot will insert a <nowiki><br></nowiki>. Your proposal looks quite good. After 0.12 is released, we should edit all the pages in [[:Category:Resistance]] and [[:Category:Vulnerability]] according to this naming convention. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 19:51, 18 April 2013 (CEST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Here's some names that I think get the idea across while still reducing letter count nicely. I also think that the order should be uniform for all monsters, and that we should put the common items first before getting to the more exotic items
-:rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rTorm -> rSticky -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil
+:rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rTorm -> rRot -> rSticky -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil
 :For vulnerabilities, we should just display the substance the creature is vulnerable to:

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 :Here's some names that I think get the idea across while still reducing letter count nicely. I also think that the order should be uniform for all monsters, and that we should put the common items first before getting to the more exotic items
-:rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rSticky -> rTorm -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil
+:rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rTorm -> rSticky -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil
 :For vulnerabilities, we should just display the substance the creature is vulnerable to:

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 18 April 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The monster template that appears on this page was generated by the bot. It did a pretty good job, but the fields which contain the resistances and vulnerabilities look a bit ugly, because the naming of the resistances and vulnerabilities is not uniform. I am not too sure which names we should be using. For example: rDrowning? Drowning? rConstrict? rConstriction?, ... I'm open to any suggestions. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 15:42, 18 April 2013 (CEST)		The monster template that appears on this page was generated by the bot. It did a pretty good job, but the fields which contain the resistances and vulnerabilities look a bit ugly, because the naming of the resistances and vulnerabilities is not uniform. I am not too sure which names we should be using. For example: rDrowning? Drowning? rConstrict? rConstriction?, ... I'm open to any suggestions. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 15:42, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
		+	:Here's some names that I think get the idea across while still reducing letter count nicely. I also think that the order should be uniform for all monsters, and that we should put the common items first before getting to the more exotic items
		+
		+	:rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rSticky -> rTorm -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil
		+
		+	:For vulnerabilities, we should just display the substance the creature is vulnerable to:
		+
		+	:[[Fire]] -> [[Cold]] -> [[Poison]] -> [[Holy]] -> [[Holy wrath\|Wrath]] -> [[Silver]] -> [[Orc slaying]] -> [[Dragon slaying]]
		+
		+	:Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 16:36, 18 April 2013 (CEST)