Talk:Comestibles and satiation - Revision history

Sifmole: /* Updating this page */

2014-11-26T20:47:55Z

‎Updating this page

Sifmole: /* Updating this page */

2014-11-26T20:47:18Z

‎Updating this page

MoogleDan at 20:15, 26 November 2014

2014-11-26T20:15:52Z

Sifmole: /* Updating this page */

2014-11-26T18:54:39Z

‎Updating this page

Sifmole: /* Updating this page */ new section

2014-11-26T18:53:37Z

‎Updating this page: new section

MoogleDan: Reply to Bwijn

2013-02-25T02:47:39Z

Reply to Bwijn

Bwijn: calculable?

2013-02-24T21:08:26Z

calculable?

New page

== Tactical use possible? ==

I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 26 November 2014
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:I think a heavy-handed approach would be appropriate here. The threat of starvation is significantly less severe now than it was in earlier versions of ''Crawl''. I forgot how massive this page was... I'll take a look through it later and simplify / cut what I can, but if you feel like doing so, by all means, go ahead. Just make sure to note any changes in the History section at the bottom. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 November 2014 (CET)		:I think a heavy-handed approach would be appropriate here. The threat of starvation is significantly less severe now than it was in earlier versions of ''Crawl''. I forgot how massive this page was... I'll take a look through it later and simplify / cut what I can, but if you feel like doing so, by all means, go ahead. Just make sure to note any changes in the History section at the bottom. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 November 2014 (CET)

−	::I'll start picking away at some of the "after 0.15" stuff and keep notes in the history section. --[[User:Sifmole\|Sifmole]] ([[User talk:Sifmole\|talk]]) 21:47, 26 November 2014 (CET)	+	::I'll start picking away at some of the "after 0.15" stuff and keep notes in the history section. Any suggestions you have for organization or changes but don't have time or interest to complete, feel free to pass along. --[[User:Sifmole\|Sifmole]] ([[User talk:Sifmole\|talk]]) 21:47, 26 November 2014 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 26 November 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:

	:I think a heavy-handed approach would be appropriate here. The threat of starvation is significantly less severe now than it was in earlier versions of ''Crawl''. I forgot how massive this page was... I'll take a look through it later and simplify / cut what I can, but if you feel like doing so, by all means, go ahead. Just make sure to note any changes in the History section at the bottom. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 November 2014 (CET)		:I think a heavy-handed approach would be appropriate here. The threat of starvation is significantly less severe now than it was in earlier versions of ''Crawl''. I forgot how massive this page was... I'll take a look through it later and simplify / cut what I can, but if you feel like doing so, by all means, go ahead. Just make sure to note any changes in the History section at the bottom. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 November 2014 (CET)
		+
		+	::I'll start picking away at some of the "after 0.15" stuff and keep notes in the history section. --[[User:Sifmole\|Sifmole]] ([[User talk:Sifmole\|talk]]) 21:47, 26 November 2014 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 26 November 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:

	This page currently has alot of "after 0.15" type of comments in the text. Would it be appropriate to update the page to reflect to cleanly reflect the state as of 0.15? If that is done, would it be desirable to keep a version that reflects the kind of historical commentary the page has now? What would be the best practice method of accomplishing such a retention? Looking to help, but don't want to overstep. [[User:Sifmole\|Sifmole]]		This page currently has alot of "after 0.15" type of comments in the text. Would it be appropriate to update the page to reflect to cleanly reflect the state as of 0.15? If that is done, would it be desirable to keep a version that reflects the kind of historical commentary the page has now? What would be the best practice method of accomplishing such a retention? Looking to help, but don't want to overstep. [[User:Sifmole\|Sifmole]]
		+
		+	:I think a heavy-handed approach would be appropriate here. The threat of starvation is significantly less severe now than it was in earlier versions of ''Crawl''. I forgot how massive this page was... I'll take a look through it later and simplify / cut what I can, but if you feel like doing so, by all means, go ahead. Just make sure to note any changes in the History section at the bottom. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 21:15, 26 November 2014 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:54, 26 November 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Updating this page ==		== Updating this page ==

−	This page currently has alot of "after 0.15" type of comments in the text. Would it be appropriate to update the page to reflect to cleanly reflect the state as of 0.15? If that is done, would it be desirable to keep a version that reflects the kind of historical commentary the page has now? What would be the best practice method of accomplishing such a retention? Looking to help, but don't want to overstep.	+	This page currently has alot of "after 0.15" type of comments in the text. Would it be appropriate to update the page to reflect to cleanly reflect the state as of 0.15? If that is done, would it be desirable to keep a version that reflects the kind of historical commentary the page has now? What would be the best practice method of accomplishing such a retention? Looking to help, but don't want to overstep. [[User:Sifmole\|Sifmole]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, 26 November 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)		I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)
	:It's always one mutation, and always random (unless it's rotten, in which case it's a bad mutation). While this may occasionally remove one of your current mutations, it's ALWAYS more likely to either give you a new one or do nothing at all. I can't say there's much tactical value to it. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 03:47, 25 February 2013 (CET)		:It's always one mutation, and always random (unless it's rotten, in which case it's a bad mutation). While this may occasionally remove one of your current mutations, it's ALWAYS more likely to either give you a new one or do nothing at all. I can't say there's much tactical value to it. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 03:47, 25 February 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	== Updating this page ==
		+
		+	This page currently has alot of "after 0.15" type of comments in the text. Would it be appropriate to update the page to reflect to cleanly reflect the state as of 0.15? If that is done, would it be desirable to keep a version that reflects the kind of historical commentary the page has now? What would be the best practice method of accomplishing such a retention? Looking to help, but don't want to overstep.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:47, 25 February 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)		I just read: eating some mutagenic chunk "Causes a random mutation". Is that accurate and reliable? If it is just one(!) random mutation it could be used to get rid of one pesky bad mutation without loosing the good ones. We know that a [[potion of mutation]] mostly gives 2-4 random mutations. And a [[potion of cure mutation]] removes 3-max 7 of them. No chance to calculate it. Any good experiences out there? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:08, 24 February 2013 (CET)
		+	:It's always one mutation, and always random (unless it's rotten, in which case it's a bad mutation). While this may occasionally remove one of your current mutations, it's ALWAYS more likely to either give you a new one or do nothing at all. I can't say there's much tactical value to it. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 03:47, 25 February 2013 (CET)