Talk:Constriction - Revision history

Wwf: Removed "in progress" information.

2022-03-23T08:50:50Z

Removed "in progress" information.

Wwf: Noting partial page update

2022-03-23T06:55:06Z

Noting partial page update

Derrek: reply to spudwalt

2014-05-01T16:09:59Z

reply to spudwalt

Spudwalt: Created page with "I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all in..."

2014-05-01T07:37:02Z

Created page with "I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all in..."

New page

I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:50, 23 March 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held\|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek\|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek\|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST)		:Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held\|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek\|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek\|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST)

−	~~'''Page~~ update ~~in progress'''~~	+	Finished page update. --[[User:Wwf\|Wwf]] ([[User talk:Wwf\|talk]]) 09:50, 23 March 2022 (CET)
−	~~Page has been updated with 0.28 constrictors and monsters that cannot be constricted.~~
−	~~The to_hit calculation has been updated to 0.28, but I have not yet tracked down when the change occurred.~~
−	~~I will be reviewing the damage calculation before updating the version tag to 0.28~~. [[User:Wwf\|Wwf]] ([[User talk:Wwf\|talk]]) 07:55, 23 March 2022 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 23 March 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)		I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)
	:Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held\|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek\|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek\|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST)		:Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held\|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek\|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek\|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST)
		+
		+	'''Page update in progress'''
		+	Page has been updated with 0.28 constrictors and monsters that cannot be constricted.
		+	The to_hit calculation has been updated to 0.28, but I have not yet tracked down when the change occurred.
		+	I will be reviewing the damage calculation before updating the version tag to 0.28. [[User:Wwf\|Wwf]] ([[User talk:Wwf\|talk]]) 07:55, 23 March 2022 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 1 May 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)		I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)
		+	:Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held\|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek\|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek\|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST)