Talk:Crawl Wiki - Revision history

Ge0ff: /* Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia] */ re: use it or lose it

2022-08-22T23:41:24Z

‎Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia]: re: use it or lose it

Hordes: /* Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia] */

2022-08-21T19:42:20Z

‎Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia]

Hordes: /* Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia] */ new section

2022-08-21T19:40:54Z

‎Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia]: new section

Spudwalt: /* Design philosophies link dead */

2018-05-30T03:25:03Z

‎Design philosophies link dead

Arvy: /* Design philosophies link dead */ new section

2018-05-29T17:09:04Z

‎Design philosophies link dead: new section

Flun at 12:22, 7 April 2014

2014-04-07T12:22:28Z

Flun: reply to arcanist

2014-04-07T12:18:11Z

reply to arcanist

Arcanist at 08:27, 7 April 2014

2014-04-07T08:27:19Z

Bwijn: /* Ideas for the main page */ reply to Dan

2013-03-24T20:05:06Z

‎Ideas for the main page: reply to Dan

Ion frigate at 16:42, 24 March 2013

2013-03-24T16:42:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:41, 22 August 2022
Line 52:		Line 52:

	Pretty simple question. The [[roguelike]] page is something that I am obviously going to be biased in including (as I rewrote it), but the Wikipedia page is also useful; linking it at the bottom of the wiki RL page isn't really "enough" justice, I feel. The other problem with the wiki RL page is that it repeats what's said in the wiki blurb, intentionally so, so may feel redundant to read. --[[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 21:40, 21 August 2022 (CEST)		Pretty simple question. The [[roguelike]] page is something that I am obviously going to be biased in including (as I rewrote it), but the Wikipedia page is also useful; linking it at the bottom of the wiki RL page isn't really "enough" justice, I feel. The other problem with the wiki RL page is that it repeats what's said in the wiki blurb, intentionally so, so may feel redundant to read. --[[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 21:40, 21 August 2022 (CEST)
		+
		+	: The [[roguelike]] article looks pretty good. We should use it instead of linking to the Wikipedia page. [[User:Ge0ff\|Ge0ff]] ([[User talk:Ge0ff\|talk]]) 01:41, 23 August 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 21 August 2022
Line 51:		Line 51:
	== Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia] ==		== Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia] ==

−	Pretty simple question. The [[roguelike]] page is something that I am obviously going to be biased in including (as I rewrote it), but the Wikipedia page is also useful; linking it at the bottom of the wiki RL page isn't really "enough" justice, I feel.--[[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 21:40, 21 August 2022 (CEST)	+	Pretty simple question. The [[roguelike]] page is something that I am obviously going to be biased in including (as I rewrote it), but the Wikipedia page is also useful; linking it at the bottom of the wiki RL page isn't really "enough" justice, I feel. The other problem with the wiki RL page is that it repeats what's said in the wiki blurb, intentionally so, so may feel redundant to read. --[[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 21:40, 21 August 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 21 August 2022
Line 48:		Line 48:
	--[[User:Arvy\|Arvy]] ([[User talk:Arvy\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 May 2018 (CEST)		--[[User:Arvy\|Arvy]] ([[User talk:Arvy\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 May 2018 (CEST)
	:Done. [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 05:25, 30 May 2018 (CEST)		:Done. [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 05:25, 30 May 2018 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Roguelike vs Roguelike [Wikipedia] ==
		+
		+	Pretty simple question. The [[roguelike]] page is something that I am obviously going to be biased in including (as I rewrote it), but the Wikipedia page is also useful; linking it at the bottom of the wiki RL page isn't really "enough" justice, I feel.--[[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 21:40, 21 August 2022 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:25, 30 May 2018
Line 47:		Line 47:
	CDO no longer seems to host the manual. Can the link to http://crawl.develz.org/other/manual.html#n-philosophy-pas-de-faq be changed to point towards https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/docs/crawl_manual.rst#n-philosophy-pas-de-faq ?		CDO no longer seems to host the manual. Can the link to http://crawl.develz.org/other/manual.html#n-philosophy-pas-de-faq be changed to point towards https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/docs/crawl_manual.rst#n-philosophy-pas-de-faq ?
	--[[User:Arvy\|Arvy]] ([[User talk:Arvy\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 May 2018 (CEST)		--[[User:Arvy\|Arvy]] ([[User talk:Arvy\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 May 2018 (CEST)
		+	:Done. [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 05:25, 30 May 2018 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:09, 29 May 2018
Line 42:		Line 42:
	: Which link for the latest stable release is leading to 0.13.2? The [[Current release]] article redirects to 0.14. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:18, 7 April 2014 (CEST)		: Which link for the latest stable release is leading to 0.13.2? The [[Current release]] article redirects to 0.14. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:18, 7 April 2014 (CEST)
	: Ah I see you meant the crawl.develz.org site says latest stable is 0.13.2. Yeah, the change on the Wiki to 0.14 was a little early but 0.14 should be coming out soon because of the tourney on Apr 11th. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:22, 7 April 2014 (CEST)		: Ah I see you meant the crawl.develz.org site says latest stable is 0.13.2. Yeah, the change on the Wiki to 0.14 was a little early but 0.14 should be coming out soon because of the tourney on Apr 11th. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:22, 7 April 2014 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Design philosophies link dead ==
		+
		+	CDO no longer seems to host the manual. Can the link to http://crawl.develz.org/other/manual.html#n-philosophy-pas-de-faq be changed to point towards https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/docs/crawl_manual.rst#n-philosophy-pas-de-faq ?
		+	--[[User:Arvy\|Arvy]] ([[User talk:Arvy\|talk]]) 19:09, 29 May 2018 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 7 April 2014
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Currently the version thing is in a very strange stage. The main page says that the articles should be up to date with the 0.14 release, but the link to the latest stable release is leading to the version 0,13,2. I think this leads to more confusion then clarifyes anything... --Arcanist		Currently the version thing is in a very strange stage. The main page says that the articles should be up to date with the 0.14 release, but the link to the latest stable release is leading to the version 0,13,2. I think this leads to more confusion then clarifyes anything... --Arcanist
	: Which link for the latest stable release is leading to 0.13.2? The [[Current release]] article redirects to 0.14. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:18, 7 April 2014 (CEST)		: Which link for the latest stable release is leading to 0.13.2? The [[Current release]] article redirects to 0.14. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:18, 7 April 2014 (CEST)
		+	: Ah I see you meant the crawl.develz.org site says latest stable is 0.13.2. Yeah, the change on the Wiki to 0.14 was a little early but 0.14 should be coming out soon because of the tourney on Apr 11th. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:22, 7 April 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 7 April 2014
Line 37:		Line 37:
	:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)		:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)

−	Currently the version thing is in a very strange stage. The main page says that the articles should be up to date with the 0.14 release, but the link to the latest stable release is leading to the version 0,13,2. I think this leads to more confusion then clarifyes anything...	+	==Bugs==
		+
		+	Currently the version thing is in a very strange stage. The main page says that the articles should be up to date with the 0.14 release, but the link to the latest stable release is leading to the version 0,13,2. I think this leads to more confusion then clarifyes anything... --Arcanist
		+	: Which link for the latest stable release is leading to 0.13.2? The [[Current release]] article redirects to 0.14. --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:18, 7 April 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 7 April 2014
Line 36:		Line 36:

	:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)		:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	Currently the version thing is in a very strange stage. The main page says that the articles should be up to date with the 0.14 release, but the link to the latest stable release is leading to the version 0,13,2. I think this leads to more confusion then clarifyes anything...

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 24 March 2013
Line 32:		Line 32:

	:::::::I personally don't see how an announcement about the crystal ball articles or [[Special:PopularPages\|statistics on page popularity]] are really going to wow anyone >_> As for the debate stuff, that belongs in [https://crawl.develz.org/tavern/ the Tavern], not on the wiki. Bwijn, you keep trying to suggest we make this wiki a more sociable place, but it's really just a data depository. There already are debates and discussions going on over at the actual forums. I really don't understand why you don't give them a try! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 17:22, 24 March 2013 (CET)		:::::::I personally don't see how an announcement about the crystal ball articles or [[Special:PopularPages\|statistics on page popularity]] are really going to wow anyone >_> As for the debate stuff, that belongs in [https://crawl.develz.org/tavern/ the Tavern], not on the wiki. Bwijn, you keep trying to suggest we make this wiki a more sociable place, but it's really just a data depository. There already are debates and discussions going on over at the actual forums. I really don't understand why you don't give them a try! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 17:22, 24 March 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	::::::::Form follows function since World War I. But I point at e.g. suburban settlements of single-detached homes: all forms of urban segregation are boring, emotional dead areas. So are websites that are intentionally mostly separating all functions: somewhat lifeless and boring, cemeteries of knowledge. - From real life I know "a little bit" about those things. But you are free not to agree with me. As long as you respect that it is my prefered view, you can stay with your own. And if the wiki community majority speaks out against my ideas I'll respect that too. So don't let us tell each other what "you" should do. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 21:05, 24 March 2013 (CET)

	:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)		:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, 24 March 2013
Line 32:		Line 32:

	:::::::I personally don't see how an announcement about the crystal ball articles or [[Special:PopularPages\|statistics on page popularity]] are really going to wow anyone >_> As for the debate stuff, that belongs in [https://crawl.develz.org/tavern/ the Tavern], not on the wiki. Bwijn, you keep trying to suggest we make this wiki a more sociable place, but it's really just a data depository. There already are debates and discussions going on over at the actual forums. I really don't understand why you don't give them a try! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 17:22, 24 March 2013 (CET)		:::::::I personally don't see how an announcement about the crystal ball articles or [[Special:PopularPages\|statistics on page popularity]] are really going to wow anyone >_> As for the debate stuff, that belongs in [https://crawl.develz.org/tavern/ the Tavern], not on the wiki. Bwijn, you keep trying to suggest we make this wiki a more sociable place, but it's really just a data depository. There already are debates and discussions going on over at the actual forums. I really don't understand why you don't give them a try! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 17:22, 24 March 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	:Just a point on featured articles - I should have been clearer, I'm certainly not thinking of having one every day. NetHackWiki does one every month, and I was thinking of that as a maximum rate. We might even change them as little as every 2-3 months. We'd want to agree on a regular time so we don't end up having the same featured article for two years, but we certainly wouldn't be changing them so rapidly that we'd run out of good articles any time soon. And as Flun says, we can refeature articles. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 17:42, 24 March 2013 (CET)