Talk:Deep Dwarf - Revision history

Bwijn: /* Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex? */ reply

2015-10-26T11:57:17Z

‎Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex?: reply

Chikinn at 00:20, 26 October 2015

2015-10-26T00:20:23Z

Bwijn: /* Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex? */ you can

2015-10-25T19:27:33Z

‎Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex?: you can

Chikinn: /* Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex? */ new section

2015-10-24T01:20:24Z

‎Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex?: new section

MoogleDan at 11:50, 8 April 2015

2015-04-08T11:50:29Z

Edsrzf: Easy species?

2015-04-07T23:59:42Z

Easy species?

MoogleDan at 13:36, 31 January 2014

2014-01-31T13:36:20Z

And into: Created page with "More species page clean up. Removed some redundant or obvious points, cut out some fluff, corrected a few bits of misinformation. (e.g., Deep Dwarves do not get a reduced spel..."

2014-01-31T06:04:42Z

Created page with "More species page clean up. Removed some redundant or obvious points, cut out some fluff, corrected a few bits of misinformation. (e.g., Deep Dwarves do not get a reduced spel..."

New page

More species page clean up. Removed some redundant or obvious points, cut out some fluff, corrected a few bits of misinformation. (e.g., Deep Dwarves do not get a reduced spell casting penalty from dwarven armor—confirmed in Wizard Mode myself.)

Yours,
and into

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 26 October 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:I've removed two sentences with AFAIK obsolete contents. As a matter of fact you can find elixir cards in Nemelex gifts if you are lucky! But be aware that elixir is only a temporary boost of xp not healing. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (CET)		:I've removed two sentences with AFAIK obsolete contents. As a matter of fact you can find elixir cards in Nemelex gifts if you are lucky! But be aware that elixir is only a temporary boost of xp not healing. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (CET)
	::Wait, really? I thought it was a temporary boost for allies but regular healing for the player. Elixir page still says it heals :O --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 01:20, 26 October 2015 (CET)		::Wait, really? I thought it was a temporary boost for allies but regular healing for the player. Elixir page still says it heals :O --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 01:20, 26 October 2015 (CET)
		+	:::The text of [[Elixir card]] is: "The Elixir card increases the player's HP or MP rapidly for a few turns. At power level 2, both will be fully restored over 10 turns." I'd say "increase for a few turns" is a clear statement, means temportary boost. OTOH I've never been a fervent Nemelex believer, so rarely ever saw elixir card in action. If you have sure evidence that the wiki text as it is leads astray speak out and let us know your reasons. If those reasons are convincing the text would be changed. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 12:57, 26 October 2015 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 26 October 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:
	I'm seeing conflicting information. The Nemelex page says (s)he gifts Destruction, Escape, and War decks. The Elixir page says the card can be found in Changes/Defense/Escape/War. But the Non-Renewable Healing section of this page says Elixirs are found in Changes/Defense/War (not Escape?), and claims that thus it is not possible to get an Elixir from Nemelex. But it seems it should be possible, since Nemelex gifts at least War decks (even setting aside the matter of Escape). Which is correct? --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 03:20, 24 October 2015 (CEST)		I'm seeing conflicting information. The Nemelex page says (s)he gifts Destruction, Escape, and War decks. The Elixir page says the card can be found in Changes/Defense/Escape/War. But the Non-Renewable Healing section of this page says Elixirs are found in Changes/Defense/War (not Escape?), and claims that thus it is not possible to get an Elixir from Nemelex. But it seems it should be possible, since Nemelex gifts at least War decks (even setting aside the matter of Escape). Which is correct? --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 03:20, 24 October 2015 (CEST)
	:I've removed two sentences with AFAIK obsolete contents. As a matter of fact you can find elixir cards in Nemelex gifts if you are lucky! But be aware that elixir is only a temporary boost of xp not healing. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (CET)		:I've removed two sentences with AFAIK obsolete contents. As a matter of fact you can find elixir cards in Nemelex gifts if you are lucky! But be aware that elixir is only a temporary boost of xp not healing. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (CET)
		+	::Wait, really? I thought it was a temporary boost for allies but regular healing for the player. Elixir page still says it heals :O --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 01:20, 26 October 2015 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 25 October 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I'm seeing conflicting information. The Nemelex page says (s)he gifts Destruction, Escape, and War decks. The Elixir page says the card can be found in Changes/Defense/Escape/War. But the Non-Renewable Healing section of this page says Elixirs are found in Changes/Defense/War (not Escape?), and claims that thus it is not possible to get an Elixir from Nemelex. But it seems it should be possible, since Nemelex gifts at least War decks (even setting aside the matter of Escape). Which is correct? --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 03:20, 24 October 2015 (CEST)		I'm seeing conflicting information. The Nemelex page says (s)he gifts Destruction, Escape, and War decks. The Elixir page says the card can be found in Changes/Defense/Escape/War. But the Non-Renewable Healing section of this page says Elixirs are found in Changes/Defense/War (not Escape?), and claims that thus it is not possible to get an Elixir from Nemelex. But it seems it should be possible, since Nemelex gifts at least War decks (even setting aside the matter of Escape). Which is correct? --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 03:20, 24 October 2015 (CEST)
		+	:I've removed two sentences with AFAIK obsolete contents. As a matter of fact you can find elixir cards in Nemelex gifts if you are lucky! But be aware that elixir is only a temporary boost of xp not healing. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 20:27, 25 October 2015 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 24 October 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	I'm fairly new to DCSS and not very good, and of course species difficulty is subjective, but are deep dwarves really an easy species? The lack of regen alone seems like it would put them in "moderate" if not "difficult". I've tried a few games and have quite a bit of trouble even getting past the temple. [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 01:59, 8 April 2015 (CEST)		I'm fairly new to DCSS and not very good, and of course species difficulty is subjective, but are deep dwarves really an easy species? The lack of regen alone seems like it would put them in "moderate" if not "difficult". I've tried a few games and have quite a bit of trouble even getting past the temple. [[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 01:59, 8 April 2015 (CEST)
	:Deep dwarves are a weird species, and not very balanced, but in the grand scheme of things they definitely qualify as easy. They're pretty much forced to stick to gods that provide healing (or to cast [[Vampiric Draining]] on everything in sight), but the fact that they begin the game with a massive stockpile of very good healing items means they have a very easy time surviving the early game once you get some experience under your belt. The early part of the game is generally considered to be the hardest and deadliest, as you have so few tools to deal with the random deadliness the game throws at you, so having tons of healing items there is an amazing advantage. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:50, 8 April 2015 (CEST)		:Deep dwarves are a weird species, and not very balanced, but in the grand scheme of things they definitely qualify as easy. They're pretty much forced to stick to gods that provide healing (or to cast [[Vampiric Draining]] on everything in sight), but the fact that they begin the game with a massive stockpile of very good healing items means they have a very easy time surviving the early game once you get some experience under your belt. The early part of the game is generally considered to be the hardest and deadliest, as you have so few tools to deal with the random deadliness the game throws at you, so having tons of healing items there is an amazing advantage. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:50, 8 April 2015 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Possible to get Elixir from Nemelex? ==
		+
		+	I'm seeing conflicting information. The Nemelex page says (s)he gifts Destruction, Escape, and War decks. The Elixir page says the card can be found in Changes/Defense/Escape/War. But the Non-Renewable Healing section of this page says Elixirs are found in Changes/Defense/War (not Escape?), and claims that thus it is not possible to get an Elixir from Nemelex. But it seems it should be possible, since Nemelex gifts at least War decks (even setting aside the matter of Escape). Which is correct? --[[User:Chikinn\|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn\|talk]]) 03:20, 24 October 2015 (CEST)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ==Easy Species?==
-I'm fairly new to DCSS and not very good, and of course species difficulty is subjective, but are deep dwarves really an easy species? The lack of regen alone seems like it would put them in "moderate" if not "difficult". I've tried a few games and have quite a bit of trouble even getting past the temple.
+I'm fairly new to DCSS and not very good, and of course species difficulty is subjective, but are deep dwarves really an easy species? The lack of regen alone seems like it would put them in "moderate" if not "difficult". I've tried a few games and have quite a bit of trouble even getting past the temple. [[User:Edsrzf|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf|talk]]) 01:59, 8 April 2015 (CEST)
+:Deep dwarves are a weird species, and not very balanced, but in the grand scheme of things they definitely qualify as easy. They're pretty much forced to stick to gods that provide healing (or to cast [[Vampiric Draining]] on everything in sight), but the fact that they begin the game with a massive stockpile of very good healing items means they have a very easy time surviving the early game once you get some experience under your belt. The early part of the game is generally considered to be the hardest and deadliest, as you have so few tools to deal with the random deadliness the game throws at you, so having tons of healing items there is an amazing advantage. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 13:50, 8 April 2015 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:59, 7 April 2015
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I was wondering about that; I was reading over your changes, noticed that that detail got cut, checked the Knowledge Bot, and was about to ask you about that excision here until I read your explanation. Thanks for the Wiz check! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 14:36, 31 January 2014 (CET)		:I was wondering about that; I was reading over your changes, noticed that that detail got cut, checked the Knowledge Bot, and was about to ask you about that excision here until I read your explanation. Thanks for the Wiz check! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 14:36, 31 January 2014 (CET)
		+
		+	==Easy Species?==
		+
		+	I'm fairly new to DCSS and not very good, and of course species difficulty is subjective, but are deep dwarves really an easy species? The lack of regen alone seems like it would put them in "moderate" if not "difficult". I've tried a few games and have quite a bit of trouble even getting past the temple.
		+
		+	[[User:Edsrzf\|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf\|talk]]) 01:59, 8 April 2015 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:36, 31 January 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Yours,		Yours,
	and into		and into
		+
		+	:I was wondering about that; I was reading over your changes, noticed that that detail got cut, checked the Knowledge Bot, and was about to ask you about that excision here until I read your explanation. Thanks for the Wiz check! --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 14:36, 31 January 2014 (CET)