Talk:Dispel Undead - Revision history

Bwijn: /* How come? */ thanks, clear now

2014-08-13T15:13:36Z

‎How come?: thanks, clear now

MoogleDan at 11:50, 11 August 2014

2014-08-11T11:50:18Z

Bwijn: /* How come? */ new section

2014-08-11T09:55:53Z

‎How come?: new section

New page

== How come? ==

Max Damage is 3d(31.66) according to the math table. How come that the dice parameter is a broken one? Anybody out there who got any idea why it is sth. like '31.66' and not a simple integer '32'? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 11:55, 11 August 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 13 August 2014
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Max Damage is 3d(31.66) according to the math table. How come that the dice parameter is a broken one? Anybody out there who got any idea why it is something like '31.66' and not a simple integer '32'? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 11:55, 11 August 2014 (CEST)		Max Damage is 3d(31.66) according to the math table. How come that the dice parameter is a broken one? Anybody out there who got any idea why it is something like '31.66' and not a simple integer '32'? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 11:55, 11 August 2014 (CEST)
	:It's not broken. The game rounds the damage either up or down, determined by the RNG. That .66 means that there's a 66% chance it'll be rounded up, and a 34% chance it'll be rounded down. If it was 3d31.01, it would almost always (99% chance) round down to 3d31, and very rarely (1% chance) round up to 3d32. Make sense? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:50, 11 August 2014 (CEST)		:It's not broken. The game rounds the damage either up or down, determined by the RNG. That .66 means that there's a 66% chance it'll be rounded up, and a 34% chance it'll be rounded down. If it was 3d31.01, it would almost always (99% chance) round down to 3d31, and very rarely (1% chance) round up to 3d32. Make sense? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:50, 11 August 2014 (CEST)
		+	::Thank you. That makes it clear now. I didn't know the concept of writing probability just like that. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 17:13, 13 August 2014 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 11 August 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== How come? ==		== How come? ==

−	Max Damage is 3d(31.66) according to the math table. How come that the dice parameter is a broken one? Anybody out there who got any idea why it is ~~sth.~~ like '31.66' and not a simple integer '32'? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 11:55, 11 August 2014 (CEST)	+	Max Damage is 3d(31.66) according to the math table. How come that the dice parameter is a broken one? Anybody out there who got any idea why it is something like '31.66' and not a simple integer '32'? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 11:55, 11 August 2014 (CEST)
		+	:It's not broken. The game rounds the damage either up or down, determined by the RNG. That .66 means that there's a 66% chance it'll be rounded up, and a 34% chance it'll be rounded down. If it was 3d31.01, it would almost always (99% chance) round down to 3d31, and very rarely (1% chance) round up to 3d32. Make sense? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:50, 11 August 2014 (CEST)