<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://crawl.chaosforge.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AGell%27s_Gravitas</id>
		<title>Talk:Gell's Gravitas - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://crawl.chaosforge.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AGell%27s_Gravitas"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://crawl.chaosforge.org/index.php?title=Talk:Gell%27s_Gravitas&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-17T19:58:26Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.30.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://crawl.chaosforge.org/index.php?title=Talk:Gell%27s_Gravitas&amp;diff=36459&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bwijn: /* Usefulness? */ new section</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://crawl.chaosforge.org/index.php?title=Talk:Gell%27s_Gravitas&amp;diff=36459&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-04-20T08:04:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;‎&lt;span dir=&quot;auto&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;autocomment&quot;&gt;Usefulness?: &lt;/span&gt; new section&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Usefulness? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this somewhat obscure spell any useful? Maybe at least as means to buy time for escape by breaking LoS? But indeed the  collision damage is damned weak and the confuses are very short-timed, the pull is just from a 2-tile radius towards the target. This smaller sibling of [[Singularity]] spell can't compete with other options.&lt;br /&gt;
Just as [https://crawl.develz.org/tavern/viewtopic.php?f=8&amp;amp;t=14909 Nicolae mused]: &amp;quot;I get the impression that Gell's Gravitas mostly exists because &amp;quot;forced motion&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;collision damage&amp;quot; got implemented or improved for Singularity and someone wanted to see what other things could be done with them.&amp;quot; Obviously GG is a hot candidate for being dropped completely. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 10:04, 20 April 2015 (CEST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bwijn</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>