Talk:Glaive of Prune - Revision history

MoogleDan: Reply to Buddy Lee

2013-09-16T21:30:15Z

Reply to Buddy Lee

Buddy23Lee: Left sorry-for-breaking-it followup :)

2013-09-16T21:14:49Z

Left sorry-for-breaking-it followup :)

MoogleDan: You're welcome! (and painful critique)

2013-09-16T20:14:08Z

You're welcome! (and painful critique)

Buddy23Lee: Left thanks

2013-09-16T19:38:30Z

Left thanks

CommanderC at 18:39, 16 September 2013

2013-09-16T18:39:42Z

Buddy23Lee: Left comment

2013-09-16T18:02:22Z

Left comment

New page

It seems like we should provide some content here that addresses the whole turning into a prune thing. (i.e. is it worth using?) As a player, I've always been too afraid to wield the damned thing when I find it, but if there was clear info here as to what you could expect in doing so, I might have been more bold. I can only assume that other people might visit this article for similar reasons. --[[User:Buddy23Lee|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee|talk]]) 20:02, 16 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 16 September 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::::Totally, and sorry for any waste of time with that. I try to be bold in my editing which means I have to be equally willing to see my frequent overreaches get reverted. I'm still trying to get used to the style and convention here, so expect a lot of silliness from me as I try to gain my bearings. As a rule, I don't take anything personally and I always defer to more experienced and prolific contributors like yourself. --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 23:14, 16 September 2013 (CEST)		::::Totally, and sorry for any waste of time with that. I try to be bold in my editing which means I have to be equally willing to see my frequent overreaches get reverted. I'm still trying to get used to the style and convention here, so expect a lot of silliness from me as I try to gain my bearings. As a rule, I don't take anything personally and I always defer to more experienced and prolific contributors like yourself. --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 23:14, 16 September 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	:::::Definitely feel free to experiment! Honestly, it's not even like you ignored the existing format here; the unrands are about halfway through a clean-up process right now... Anyway, in general, I wish there was more discussion around here. If you think we can change the current format to something better, definitely bring it up on the Discussion pages for discussion; the majority of the people on here are actually pretty friendly when you get them paying attention :P --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 23:30, 16 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 16 September 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Considering how willing to kill you the game normally is, I wouldn't put it past them :P By the way, unless you feel like bullet-pointing every last unrand in the game, I'm going to undo your edit here : / No offense, it's just breaking from the form we have everywhere else (and I think it looks a little tacky. We had it without bullet points to better match how intrinsics are listed in-game when you examine an artefact). Are you alright with that? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 September 2013 (CEST)		:::Considering how willing to kill you the game normally is, I wouldn't put it past them :P By the way, unless you feel like bullet-pointing every last unrand in the game, I'm going to undo your edit here : / No offense, it's just breaking from the form we have everywhere else (and I think it looks a little tacky. We had it without bullet points to better match how intrinsics are listed in-game when you examine an artefact). Are you alright with that? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 September 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	::::Totally, and sorry for any waste of time with that. I try to be bold in my editing which means I have to be equally willing to see my frequent overreaches get reverted. I'm still trying to get used to the style and convention here, so expect a lot of silliness from me as I try to gain my bearings. As a rule, I don't take anything personally and I always defer to more experienced and prolific contributors like yourself. --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 23:14, 16 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 16 September 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Well now I just feel silly, per the usual. Thanks though. I'll cease worrying about feeling "pruney" or whatever it says. (seriously, I thought your character would slowly turn into a damn prune if you wielded it long enough!) --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2013 (CEST)		::Well now I just feel silly, per the usual. Thanks though. I'll cease worrying about feeling "pruney" or whatever it says. (seriously, I thought your character would slowly turn into a damn prune if you wielded it long enough!) --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	:::Considering how willing to kill you the game normally is, I wouldn't put it past them :P By the way, unless you feel like bullet-pointing every last unrand in the game, I'm going to undo your edit here : / No offense, it's just breaking from the form we have everywhere else (and I think it looks a little tacky. We had it without bullet points to better match how intrinsics are listed in-game when you examine an artefact). Are you alright with that? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 22:14, 16 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 16 September 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Lol. There is nothing to worry about. It is actually a good weapon. In older versions of the game glaives were almost as bad as scythes, but that was changed in 0.10 I think. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:39, 16 September 2013 (CEST)		:Lol. There is nothing to worry about. It is actually a good weapon. In older versions of the game glaives were almost as bad as scythes, but that was changed in 0.10 I think. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:39, 16 September 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	::Well now I just feel silly, per the usual. Thanks though. I'll cease worrying about feeling "pruney" or whatever it says. (seriously, I thought your character would slowly turn into a damn prune if you wielded it long enough!) --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 21:38, 16 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 16 September 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	It seems like we should provide some content here that addresses the whole turning into a prune thing. (i.e. is it worth using?) As a player, I've always been too afraid to wield the damned thing when I find it, but if there was clear info here as to what you could expect in doing so, I might have been more bold. I can only assume that other people might visit this article for similar reasons. --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 20:02, 16 September 2013 (CEST)		It seems like we should provide some content here that addresses the whole turning into a prune thing. (i.e. is it worth using?) As a player, I've always been too afraid to wield the damned thing when I find it, but if there was clear info here as to what you could expect in doing so, I might have been more bold. I can only assume that other people might visit this article for similar reasons. --[[User:Buddy23Lee\|Buddy23Lee]] ([[User talk:Buddy23Lee\|talk]]) 20:02, 16 September 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	:Lol. There is nothing to worry about. It is actually a good weapon. In older versions of the game glaives were almost as bad as scythes, but that was changed in 0.10 I think. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:39, 16 September 2013 (CEST)