Talk:Staff of Wucad Mu - Revision history

Hordes: /* Wucad History */

2022-07-04T11:00:05Z

‎Wucad History

Hordes: /* Wucad History */

2022-07-03T21:26:59Z

‎Wucad History

Hordes: /* Wucad History */

2022-07-03T21:20:04Z

‎Wucad History

Hordes: /* Wucad History */ new section

2022-07-03T21:19:27Z

‎Wucad History: new section

Bwijn: /* problems to come in 0.17 */ new section

2015-09-15T19:10:16Z

‎problems to come in 0.17: new section

Spudwalt: /* change from quarterstaff */ new section

2014-05-06T18:28:05Z

‎change from quarterstaff: new section

Ion frigate at 23:46, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T23:46:25Z

Ion frigate at 23:46, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T23:46:01Z

Bwijn: history chapter?

2013-02-23T23:31:05Z

history chapter?

Ion frigate at 21:21, 23 February 2013

2013-02-23T21:21:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 4 July 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Wucad History ==		== Wucad History ==

−	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28 ~~it seems~~) it was nerfed to where it is, 1.5x as strong as it was in 0.27. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further boosted by the next update).	+	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made into two sources, which is twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28) it was nerfed to where it is; 3/2 sources, or 1.5x as strong as it was in 0.27. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further boosted by the next update).

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 3 July 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Wucad History ==		== Wucad History ==

−	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28 it seems) it was nerfed to where it is, 1.5x as strong as it was in 0.27. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further ~~doubled~~ by the next update).	+	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28 it seems) it was nerfed to where it is, 1.5x as strong as it was in 0.27. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further boosted by the next update).

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 3 July 2022
Line 15:		Line 15:
	== Wucad History ==		== Wucad History ==

−	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28 it seems) it was nerfed to where it is, 1.5x. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further doubled by the next update).	+	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28 it seems) it was nerfed to where it is, 1.5x as strong as it was in 0.27. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further doubled by the next update).

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 3 July 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:

	"You can avoid confusion by having clarity, and wearing a ring of sustain abilities prevent some of the intelligence damage. Even so, a number of potions of restore abilities will be necessary if this item is to be used consistently." Well, as matters stand the developers want to remove the [[potion of restore abilities]] in [[0.17]]. (The trunk version indeed contains none of it.) What a calamity! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 21:10, 15 September 2015 (CEST)		"You can avoid confusion by having clarity, and wearing a ring of sustain abilities prevent some of the intelligence damage. Even so, a number of potions of restore abilities will be necessary if this item is to be used consistently." Well, as matters stand the developers want to remove the [[potion of restore abilities]] in [[0.17]]. (The trunk version indeed contains none of it.) What a calamity! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 21:10, 15 September 2015 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Wucad History ==
		+
		+	In commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/17eb6287541f594efa50386e8b6ff00bc8d433e3 17eb628] (0.28-trunk), Wucad Mu was made twice as strong. In [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b207118a1a4a997e50d98d681ee5b623a1c2342e b207118] (still 0.28 it seems) it was nerfed to where it is, 1.5x. This is seperate from the 0.27 commit [https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b432ad73d208dc83162d904dbd9f1fd8987cb917 b432ad7], which made it 1.5x as strong from 0.26 (further doubled by the next update).

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 15 September 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Anybody know when this stopped being a quarterstaff? [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 20:28, 6 May 2014 (CEST)		Anybody know when this stopped being a quarterstaff? [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 20:28, 6 May 2014 (CEST)
		+
		+	== problems to come in 0.17 ==
		+
		+	"You can avoid confusion by having clarity, and wearing a ring of sustain abilities prevent some of the intelligence damage. Even so, a number of potions of restore abilities will be necessary if this item is to be used consistently." Well, as matters stand the developers want to remove the [[potion of restore abilities]] in [[0.17]]. (The trunk version indeed contains none of it.) What a calamity! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 21:10, 15 September 2015 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:28, 6 May 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)		::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)
	:::Sure. Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description). One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET)		:::Sure. Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description). One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	== change from quarterstaff ==
		+
		+	Anybody know when this stopped being a quarterstaff? [[User:Spudwalt\|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt\|talk]]) 20:28, 6 May 2014 (CEST)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)
 ::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)
-:::Sure.  Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description.  One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET)
+:::Sure.  Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description).  One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:46, 23 February 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)		::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)
	::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)		::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)
		+	:::Sure. Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description. One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 23 February 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Are you playing an old version? I thought that as of 0.11, all unrands would be identified on sight, making the un-ID'd description irrelevant. Anyway, the un-ID'd descriptions are actually in pretty much all of the unrand articles, but these four staves already had articles written a while ago which don't mention the descriptions. If the un-ID'd description was found in 0.11 feel free to add it. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:20, 23 February 2013 (CET)		:Are you playing an old version? I thought that as of 0.11, all unrands would be identified on sight, making the un-ID'd description irrelevant. Anyway, the un-ID'd descriptions are actually in pretty much all of the unrand articles, but these four staves already had articles written a while ago which don't mention the descriptions. If the un-ID'd description was found in 0.11 feel free to add it. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:20, 23 February 2013 (CET)
	::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)		::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)
		+	::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 23 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I found an "ephemeral staff" at the [[Bazaar]] for a decent price. It's the Staff of Wucad Mu, which is quite difficult to evaluate. A very rarely appearing item, high risk of miscast effects and no reliable use. - Why is the "unidentified name" not part of the crawl wiki text? Is it a random and not a fixed name? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 19:29, 23 February 2013 (CET)		I found an "ephemeral staff" at the [[Bazaar]] for a decent price. It's the Staff of Wucad Mu, which is quite difficult to evaluate. A very rarely appearing item, high risk of miscast effects and no reliable use. - Why is the "unidentified name" not part of the crawl wiki text? Is it a random and not a fixed name? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 19:29, 23 February 2013 (CET)
	:Are you playing an old version? I thought that as of 0.11, all unrands would be identified on sight, making the un-ID'd description irrelevant. Anyway, the un-ID'd descriptions are actually in pretty much all of the unrand articles, but these four staves already had articles written a while ago which don't mention the descriptions. If the un-ID'd description was found in 0.11 feel free to add it. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:20, 23 February 2013 (CET)		:Are you playing an old version? I thought that as of 0.11, all unrands would be identified on sight, making the un-ID'd description irrelevant. Anyway, the un-ID'd descriptions are actually in pretty much all of the unrand articles, but these four staves already had articles written a while ago which don't mention the descriptions. If the un-ID'd description was found in 0.11 feel free to add it. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:20, 23 February 2013 (CET)
		+	::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)