Talk:Wizard statue - Revision history

MoogleDan: Reply to Syneil

2013-10-24T11:50:15Z

Reply to Syneil

Syneil at 09:07, 24 October 2013

2013-10-24T09:07:32Z

MoogleDan: Reply to Bwijn

2013-01-24T22:28:01Z

Reply to Bwijn

Bwijn: seems reduced in spell set since 0.11

2013-01-24T21:48:25Z

seems reduced in spell set since 0.11

New page

This one seems seems quite reduced in spell set since [[0.11]]. Surprising that a monster got downgraded this time. If the bot's result is correct a history chapter and clean up is needed. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 22:48, 24 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:50, 24 October 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Found one of these in D:6, so "only ever found in rare vaults" is now out-of-date. [[User:Syneil\|Syneil]] ([[User talk:Syneil\|talk]]) 11:07, 24 October 2013 (CEST)		Found one of these in D:6, so "only ever found in rare vaults" is now out-of-date. [[User:Syneil\|Syneil]] ([[User talk:Syneil\|talk]]) 11:07, 24 October 2013 (CEST)
		+	:Not necessarily; vaults occur everywhere. Was this wizard statue clearly guarding some item or an area that appeared intentionally designed, or was it just standing out in the open? --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:50, 24 October 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 24 October 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This one seems seems quite reduced in spell set since [[0.11]]. Surprising that a monster got downgraded this time. If the bot's result is correct a history chapter and clean up is needed. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:48, 24 January 2013 (CET)		This one seems seems quite reduced in spell set since [[0.11]]. Surprising that a monster got downgraded this time. If the bot's result is correct a history chapter and clean up is needed. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:48, 24 January 2013 (CET)
	:Yeah, I saw that the description is now very badly inaccurate. You may have also noticed that I'm going through them all by hand and making sure everything was processed correctly. Give me a day or two and I'll have it fixed. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 23:28, 24 January 2013 (CET)		:Yeah, I saw that the description is now very badly inaccurate. You may have also noticed that I'm going through them all by hand and making sure everything was processed correctly. Give me a day or two and I'll have it fixed. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 23:28, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+
		+	Found one of these in D:6, so "only ever found in rare vaults" is now out-of-date. [[User:Syneil\|Syneil]] ([[User talk:Syneil\|talk]]) 11:07, 24 October 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 24 January 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This one seems seems quite reduced in spell set since [[0.11]]. Surprising that a monster got downgraded this time. If the bot's result is correct a history chapter and clean up is needed. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:48, 24 January 2013 (CET)		This one seems seems quite reduced in spell set since [[0.11]]. Surprising that a monster got downgraded this time. If the bot's result is correct a history chapter and clean up is needed. -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] 22:48, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+	:Yeah, I saw that the description is now very badly inaccurate. You may have also noticed that I'm going through them all by hand and making sure everything was processed correctly. Give me a day or two and I'll have it fixed. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 23:28, 24 January 2013 (CET)