Talk:Wizardry - Revision history

Hordes at 05:21, 27 November 2023

2023-11-27T05:21:55Z

Hordes at 04:48, 27 November 2023

2023-11-27T04:48:51Z

Hordes at 04:47, 27 November 2023

2023-11-27T04:47:21Z

Hordes at 04:46, 27 November 2023

2023-11-27T04:46:52Z

Patrick2011b: found the formula

2023-11-26T22:54:45Z

found the formula

Patrick2011b: Discord says the wiki is wrong on what wizardry does

2023-11-26T22:13:42Z

Discord says the wiki is wrong on what wizardry does

New page

A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:21, 27 November 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.)		::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.)

−	:::~~EDIT - nevermind i~~ can't do math, ~~thats~~ what i get for being a wiki editor haha [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)	+	::EDIT: Nevermind, I can't do math, that's what i get for being a wiki editor haha. (For future readers, wiz x3 = 0.6 and not 0.5) [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 27 November 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)		:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)

−	::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.) [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)	+	::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.)
		+
		+	:::EDIT - nevermind i can't do math, thats what i get for being a wiki editor haha [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:47, 27 November 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)		:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)

−	::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75, wiz x 2 = x0.66..., and wiz x 3 = x0.50. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.) [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)	+	::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.) [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 27 November 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET)		A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET)
	:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)		:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)
		+
		+	::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75, wiz x 2 = x0.66..., and wiz x 3 = x0.50. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.) [[User:Hordes\|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes\|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 26 November 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET)		A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET)
		+	:I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b\|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b\|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)