Template talk:Weapon - Revision history

Ion frigate at 19:05, 15 August 2013

2013-08-15T19:05:15Z

MoogleDan at 16:27, 15 August 2013

2013-08-15T16:27:26Z

MoogleDan at 11:45, 15 August 2013

2013-08-15T11:45:39Z

Ion frigate at 08:22, 15 August 2013

2013-08-15T08:22:17Z

Ion frigate at 08:21, 15 August 2013

2013-08-15T08:21:45Z

Ion frigate at 08:21, 15 August 2013

2013-08-15T08:21:20Z

MoogleDan at 19:16, 14 August 2013

2013-08-14T19:16:21Z

MoogleDan at 19:15, 14 August 2013

2013-08-14T19:15:49Z

Flun: visualizations

2013-08-14T18:57:19Z

visualizations

MoogleDan at 18:50, 14 August 2013

2013-08-14T18:50:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 15 August 2013
Line 105:		Line 105:

	::::DONE. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 18:27, 15 August 2013 (CEST)		::::DONE. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 18:27, 15 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	:::::Nice! Thanks for stepping on this, they really look a lot better. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 21:05, 15 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 15 August 2013
Line 103:		Line 103:

	:::I'll do it manually once I clear a little bit of time out in the next hour or two. Looks like it's gonna be a slow day anyway... --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:45, 15 August 2013 (CEST)		:::I'll do it manually once I clear a little bit of time out in the next hour or two. Looks like it's gonna be a slow day anyway... --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:45, 15 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	::::DONE. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 18:27, 15 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 15 August 2013
Line 101:		Line 101:

	::I like these (specifically 1st and 5th). I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 10:21, 15 August 2013 (CEST)		::I like these (specifically 1st and 5th). I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 10:21, 15 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	:::I'll do it manually once I clear a little bit of time out in the next hour or two. Looks like it's gonna be a slow day anyway... --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan\|talk]]) 13:45, 15 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:22, 15 August 2013
Line 100:		Line 100:
	:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)		:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)

−	::I like these. I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 10:21, 15 August 2013 (CEST)	+	::I like these (specifically 1st and 5th). I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 10:21, 15 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 15 August 2013
Line 100:		Line 100:
	:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)		:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)

−	::I like these. I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually?	+	::I like these. I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate\|talk]]) 10:21, 15 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 15 August 2013
Line 99:		Line 99:

	:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)		:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	::I like these. I didn't much like the way mine looked; I had initially chosen it to be as so because I was worried about widening the right half of the template, but I didn't realize until I'd already done a fair number of them that it didn't matter (since other entries would always be longer). Does anyone have a bot capable of doing the replacements quickly, or should someone do it manually?

@@ Line 73: / Line 73: @@
 ::Actually, I think sticking to the 2 row format is fine. Presenting "6" as "60%" might be confusing to new players, as the game never presents "60%" anywhere. I like keeping it in AUTs. That being said, I do agree that having two different kinds of information in those two sets of parentheses is kind of a sloppy way to present it. How about we change "Min (req. skill)" to simply read "Min delay" (which better matches the row above it), and "6 (14)" to "6 at 14 skill" or "6 @ 14 skill"? It's still not great, but I don't want to get too wordy in there. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 20:50, 14 August 2013 (CEST)
-Here are some visualizations: --[[User:Flun|Flun]] 20:57, 14 August 2013 (CEST)
+Here are some visualizations:
 {| class="prettytable" style="border:none; margin:0; padding:0; text-align:left"
@@ Line 96: / Line 96: @@
 |}
-The third option would be for ranged.
+The third option would be for ranged. --[[User:Flun|Flun]] 20:57, 14 August 2013 (CEST)
 :Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:15, 14 August 2013
Line 97:		Line 97:

	The third option would be for ranged.		The third option would be for ranged.
		+
		+	:Fifth sir. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 21:15, 14 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 14 August 2013
Line 72:		Line 72:

	::Actually, I think sticking to the 2 row format is fine. Presenting "6" as "60%" might be confusing to new players, as the game never presents "60%" anywhere. I like keeping it in AUTs. That being said, I do agree that having two different kinds of information in those two sets of parentheses is kind of a sloppy way to present it. How about we change "Min (req. skill)" to simply read "Min delay" (which better matches the row above it), and "6 (14)" to "6 at 14 skill" or "6 @ 14 skill"? It's still not great, but I don't want to get too wordy in there. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 20:50, 14 August 2013 (CEST)		::Actually, I think sticking to the 2 row format is fine. Presenting "6" as "60%" might be confusing to new players, as the game never presents "60%" anywhere. I like keeping it in AUTs. That being said, I do agree that having two different kinds of information in those two sets of parentheses is kind of a sloppy way to present it. How about we change "Min (req. skill)" to simply read "Min delay" (which better matches the row above it), and "6 (14)" to "6 at 14 skill" or "6 @ 14 skill"? It's still not great, but I don't want to get too wordy in there. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 20:50, 14 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	Here are some visualizations: --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] 20:57, 14 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	{\| class="prettytable" style="border:none; margin:0; padding:0; text-align:left"
		+	\|-
		+	! align="left" \| [[Weapon_Speed\|Base delay]] (%)
		+	\| 13 (130%)
		+	\|-
		+	! align="left" \| [[Minimum_delay\|Min delay]]
		+	\| 6 at skill 14
		+	\|-
		+	! align="left" \| [[Minimum_delay\|Min delay]]
		+	\| 6 at 14 skill
		+	\|-
		+	! align="left" \| [[Minimum_delay\|Min delay]]
		+	\| 6 @ skill 14
		+	\|-
		+	! align="left" \| [[Minimum_delay\|Min delay]]
		+	\| 6 at sk. lvl. 14
		+	\|-
		+	! align="left" \| [[Minimum_delay\|Min delay]]
		+	\| 6 (skill req. varies)
		+	\|}
		+
		+	The third option would be for ranged.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 14 August 2013
Line 70:		Line 70:
	\| {{{ranged}}}		\| {{{ranged}}}
	\|}		\|}
		+
		+	::Actually, I think sticking to the 2 row format is fine. Presenting "6" as "60%" might be confusing to new players, as the game never presents "60%" anywhere. I like keeping it in AUTs. That being said, I do agree that having two different kinds of information in those two sets of parentheses is kind of a sloppy way to present it. How about we change "Min (req. skill)" to simply read "Min delay" (which better matches the row above it), and "6 (14)" to "6 at 14 skill" or "6 @ 14 skill"? It's still not great, but I don't want to get too wordy in there. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 20:50, 14 August 2013 (CEST)