User talk:CommanderC/Test - Revision history

CommanderC at 13:30, 2 September 2013

2013-09-02T13:30:27Z

Flun: /* Apt table */

2013-09-01T23:01:40Z

‎Apt table

CommanderC: /* Apt table */

2013-08-16T18:34:28Z

‎Apt table

Flun: apt tables and the new extensions

2013-08-16T18:14:30Z

apt tables and the new extensions

CommanderC at 14:05, 24 January 2013

2013-01-24T14:05:20Z

MoogleDan at 12:40, 24 January 2013

2013-01-24T12:40:42Z

Ion frigate at 08:41, 24 January 2013

2013-01-24T08:41:30Z

MoogleDan at 01:44, 24 January 2013

2013-01-24T01:44:15Z

Ion frigate at 23:05, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T23:05:21Z

Ion frigate at 22:56, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T22:56:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 2 September 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:The real gain is that this information will be in one place, instead of 4 or 5. Editing the [[Module:Table of aptitudes]] page will automatically change those values in a lot of places. I think we can do the same thing with the lists of spells we have in each book page or magic school page, and maybe the [[Template:spell\|spell]] templates. All the information about weapons and armours can also be put inside Lua modules. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:34, 16 August 2013 (CEST)		:The real gain is that this information will be in one place, instead of 4 or 5. Editing the [[Module:Table of aptitudes]] page will automatically change those values in a lot of places. I think we can do the same thing with the lists of spells we have in each book page or magic school page, and maybe the [[Template:spell\|spell]] templates. All the information about weapons and armours can also be put inside Lua modules. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:34, 16 August 2013 (CEST)
	:: The new one-liner tables are awesome. What is the procedure for updating the aptitude tables when a new version comes out? Do we/you just have to change [[Module:Table_of_aptitudes]]?--[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 01:01, 2 September 2013 (CEST)		:: The new one-liner tables are awesome. What is the procedure for updating the aptitude tables when a new version comes out? Do we/you just have to change [[Module:Table_of_aptitudes]]?--[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 01:01, 2 September 2013 (CEST)
		+	:::#Use <nowiki>{{subst:...}}</nowiki> in [[Sludge Elf]], [[Traps]] and [[Stabbing]], so they don't get affected by other changes.
		+	:::#Overwrite [[Module:Table_of_aptitudes]] with [[Module:Table_of_aptitudes_trunk]].
		+	:::#Replace Sludge Elves with Lava Orcs, Djinn and Gargoyles in [[Module:Apt]].
		+	:::#Remove Traps and Stabbing from [[Template:Species_aptitudes]].
		+	:::--[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 15:30, 2 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 1 September 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:The real gain is that this information will be in one place, instead of 4 or 5. Editing the [[Module:Table of aptitudes]] page will automatically change those values in a lot of places. I think we can do the same thing with the lists of spells we have in each book page or magic school page, and maybe the [[Template:spell\|spell]] templates. All the information about weapons and armours can also be put inside Lua modules. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:34, 16 August 2013 (CEST)		:The real gain is that this information will be in one place, instead of 4 or 5. Editing the [[Module:Table of aptitudes]] page will automatically change those values in a lot of places. I think we can do the same thing with the lists of spells we have in each book page or magic school page, and maybe the [[Template:spell\|spell]] templates. All the information about weapons and armours can also be put inside Lua modules. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:34, 16 August 2013 (CEST)
		+	:: The new one-liner tables are awesome. What is the procedure for updating the aptitude tables when a new version comes out? Do we/you just have to change [[Module:Table_of_aptitudes]]?--[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 01:01, 2 September 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 16 August 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==Apt table==		==Apt table==
	So I guess this will allow us to keep one giant table of aptitudes and then we can insert little tables on each species page? What other things are you planning on trying with the new extensions? --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 20:14, 16 August 2013 (CEST)		So I guess this will allow us to keep one giant table of aptitudes and then we can insert little tables on each species page? What other things are you planning on trying with the new extensions? --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 20:14, 16 August 2013 (CEST)
		+
		+	:The real gain is that this information will be in one place, instead of 4 or 5. Editing the [[Module:Table of aptitudes]] page will automatically change those values in a lot of places. I think we can do the same thing with the lists of spells we have in each book page or magic school page, and maybe the [[Template:spell\|spell]] templates. All the information about weapons and armours can also be put inside Lua modules. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC\|talk]]) 20:34, 16 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 16 August 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Older discussion==
	Looks pretty bad. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 22:53, 23 January 2013 (CET)		Looks pretty bad. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 22:53, 23 January 2013 (CET)

Line 12:		Line 13:

	:::::Implemented. I'll modify the template. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 15:05, 24 January 2013 (CET)		:::::Implemented. I'll modify the template. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 15:05, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+
		+	==Apt table==
		+	So I guess this will allow us to keep one giant table of aptitudes and then we can insert little tables on each species page? What other things are you planning on trying with the new extensions? --[[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 20:14, 16 August 2013 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 24 January 2013
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:::::Sounds fine to me. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 13:40, 24 January 2013 (CET)		:::::Sounds fine to me. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 13:40, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	:::::Implemented. I'll modify the template. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 15:05, 24 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 24 January 2013
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::::Definitely. I think it should still have a header, but perhaps it can just say "Spell set", and for monsters with multiple sets, "Spell set I", Spell set II", etc. Do people like that idea? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 09:41, 24 January 2013 (CET)		::::Definitely. I think it should still have a header, but perhaps it can just say "Spell set", and for monsters with multiple sets, "Spell set I", Spell set II", etc. Do people like that idea? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 09:41, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	:::::Sounds fine to me. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 13:40, 24 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 24 January 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::I'd say this is a huge step up from our current state of affairs. Still, could we remove the "Spells: Lich" header? We're on the Lich page looking at the Spells section; it seems pretty redundant to me. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 02:44, 24 January 2013 (CET)		:::I'd say this is a huge step up from our current state of affairs. Still, could we remove the "Spells: Lich" header? We're on the Lich page looking at the Spells section; it seems pretty redundant to me. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 02:44, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	::::Definitely. I think it should still have a header, but perhaps it can just say "Spell set", and for monsters with multiple sets, "Spell set I", Spell set II", etc. Do people like that idea? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 09:41, 24 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 24 January 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Playing with the width and margins on the templates actually seems to help a lot. Do you think it looks workable as is? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 00:05, 24 January 2013 (CET)		::Playing with the width and margins on the templates actually seems to help a lot. Do you think it looks workable as is? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 00:05, 24 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	:::I'd say this is a huge step up from our current state of affairs. Still, could we remove the "Spells: Lich" header? We're on the Lich page looking at the Spells section; it seems pretty redundant to me. --[[User:MoogleDan\|MoogleDan]] 02:44, 24 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 23 January 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Using the clear template from NetHackWiki seems to help. Another option might be to make a separate template for monsters that have multiple spell sets. This might have to be done manually, but there are definitely not that many monsters that fall into that category. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 23:56, 23 January 2013 (CET)		:Using the clear template from NetHackWiki seems to help. Another option might be to make a separate template for monsters that have multiple spell sets. This might have to be done manually, but there are definitely not that many monsters that fall into that category. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 23:56, 23 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	::Playing with the width and margins on the templates actually seems to help a lot. Do you think it looks workable as is? -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 00:05, 24 January 2013 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 23 January 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Looks pretty bad. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 22:53, 23 January 2013 (CET)		Looks pretty bad. --[[User:CommanderC\|CommanderC]] 22:53, 23 January 2013 (CET)
		+
		+	:Using the clear template from NetHackWiki seems to help. Another option might be to make a separate template for monsters that have multiple spell sets. This might have to be done manually, but there are definitely not that many monsters that fall into that category. -[[User:Ion frigate\|Ion frigate]] 23:56, 23 January 2013 (CET)