User talk:Medar - Revision history

Spudwalt: /* Removal of Igni Ipthes */

2016-12-28T20:59:07Z

‎Removal of Igni Ipthes

Medar: /* Glyph not provided by monsterlink script */

2016-12-28T13:31:52Z

‎Glyph not provided by monsterlink script

Bwijn: /* Glyph not provided by monsterlink script */ new section

2016-12-27T21:32:30Z

‎Glyph not provided by monsterlink script: new section

Bwijn: /* Removal of Igni Ipthes */ a matter to collect community votes

2016-05-30T14:53:18Z

‎Removal of Igni Ipthes: a matter to collect community votes

Medar: /* Removal of Igni Ipthes */

2016-05-30T12:08:49Z

‎Removal of Igni Ipthes

JStrange: /* Removed of Igni Ipthes */ typo

2016-05-29T14:38:23Z

‎Removed of Igni Ipthes: typo

JStrange: /* Removed of Igni Ipthes */ signature

2016-05-29T14:37:49Z

‎Removed of Igni Ipthes: signature

JStrange: /* Removed of Igni Ipthes */ new section

2016-05-29T14:37:20Z

‎Removed of Igni Ipthes: new section

Bwijn: Code diving for unique Louise

2016-04-29T11:38:36Z

Code diving for unique Louise

Medar: Reply.

2016-02-10T15:55:06Z

Reply.

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :Only admins can remove articles. I don't know if there is anything else to do after proposing deletion. --[[User:Medar|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar|talk]]) 14:08, 30 May 2016 (CEST)
 ::YOu're right, the final deletion is limited to admins. But if at least three of the active wiki workers consent this will influence the admins to act! -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2016 (CEST)
 == Glyph not provided by monsterlink script ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 28 December 2016
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Dear Medar,<br>		Dear Medar,<br>
	as you are a very experienced contributor for our wiki scripts, I'd wish you could look over [[Unique monster]] page and debug monter link for Bai Shuzen entry. The glyph won't come out. Why? Just b/c we didn't yet rerun the script after a good guy wrote the missing article? Or is sth else failing? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 22:32, 27 December 2016 (CET)		as you are a very experienced contributor for our wiki scripts, I'd wish you could look over [[Unique monster]] page and debug monter link for Bai Shuzen entry. The glyph won't come out. Why? Just b/c we didn't yet rerun the script after a good guy wrote the missing article? Or is sth else failing? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 22:32, 27 December 2016 (CET)
		+	:Looks like it uses templates for each unique, I manually created [[Template:Glyph/Bai_Suzhen]], so it should work now. -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 14:31, 28 December 2016 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 27 December 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:Only admins can remove articles. I don't know if there is anything else to do after proposing deletion. --[[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 14:08, 30 May 2016 (CEST)		:Only admins can remove articles. I don't know if there is anything else to do after proposing deletion. --[[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 14:08, 30 May 2016 (CEST)
	::YOu're right, the final deletion is limited to admins. But if at least three of the active wiki workers consent this will influence the admins to act! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2016 (CEST)		::YOu're right, the final deletion is limited to admins. But if at least three of the active wiki workers consent this will influence the admins to act! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2016 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Glyph not provided by monsterlink script ==
		+
		+	Dear Medar,<br>
		+	as you are a very experienced contributor for our wiki scripts, I'd wish you could look over [[Unique monster]] page and debug monter link for Bai Shuzen entry. The glyph won't come out. Why? Just b/c we didn't yet rerun the script after a good guy wrote the missing article? Or is sth else failing? -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 22:32, 27 December 2016 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 30 May 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed? --[[User:JStrange\|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange\|talk]]) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (CEST)		Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed? --[[User:JStrange\|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange\|talk]]) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (CEST)
	:Only admins can remove articles. I don't know if there is anything else to do after proposing deletion. --[[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 14:08, 30 May 2016 (CEST)		:Only admins can remove articles. I don't know if there is anything else to do after proposing deletion. --[[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 14:08, 30 May 2016 (CEST)
		+	::YOu're right, the final deletion is limited to admins. But if at least three of the active wiki workers consent this will influence the admins to act! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 16:53, 30 May 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 30 May 2016
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed? --[[User:JStrange\|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange\|talk]]) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (CEST)		Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed? --[[User:JStrange\|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange\|talk]]) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (CEST)
		+	:Only admins can remove articles. I don't know if there is anything else to do after proposing deletion. --[[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 14:08, 30 May 2016 (CEST)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 I like your undo action in [[Louise]] very much, because it was based on code diving and referencing the code spot. Alas, the crawl wiki has not yet been updated to the *thank you*-button script that I know from wikipedia editing. So I tell you here: thank you! -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 13:36, 29 April 2016 (CEST)
-== Removed of Igni Ipthes ==
+== Removal of Igni Ipthes ==
 Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed? --[[User:JStrange|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange|talk]]) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 29 May 2016
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== Removed of Igni Ipthes ==		== Removed of Igni Ipthes ==

−	Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed?	+	Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed? --[[User:JStrange\|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange\|talk]]) 16:37, 29 May 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 29 May 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I like your undo action in [[Louise]] very much, because it was based on code diving and referencing the code spot. Alas, the crawl wiki has not yet been updated to the thank you-button script that I know from wikipedia editing. So I tell you here: thank you! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 13:36, 29 April 2016 (CEST)		I like your undo action in [[Louise]] very much, because it was based on code diving and referencing the code spot. Alas, the crawl wiki has not yet been updated to the thank you-button script that I know from wikipedia editing. So I tell you here: thank you! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 13:36, 29 April 2016 (CEST)
		+
		+	== Removed of Igni Ipthes ==
		+
		+	Hello, I noticed the stub is still there despite no changes being made to it since 2014. I added a comment on its talk page. How to proceed?

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:38, 29 April 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Hey Medar, just wondering what happened to all the categories and templates that are up for deletion. Where they never used, or were they used before but now are no longer needed? [[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:23, 10 February 2016 (CET)		Hey Medar, just wondering what happened to all the categories and templates that are up for deletion. Where they never used, or were they used before but now are no longer needed? [[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:23, 10 February 2016 (CET)
	:Most of them appear to have been used by old versions of monster pages. Some properties have been removed. Some use different names ("No HT wand" vs. "No high tier wand" etc.). There are bunch of other unused templates that I didn't mark for removal, mostly for monster glyphs, see: [[Special:UnusedTemplates]] -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (CET)		:Most of them appear to have been used by old versions of monster pages. Some properties have been removed. Some use different names ("No HT wand" vs. "No high tier wand" etc.). There are bunch of other unused templates that I didn't mark for removal, mostly for monster glyphs, see: [[Special:UnusedTemplates]] -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (CET)
		+
		+	== Code diving for unique Louise ==
		+
		+	I like your undo action in [[Louise]] very much, because it was based on code diving and referencing the code spot. Alas, the crawl wiki has not yet been updated to the thank you-button script that I know from wikipedia editing. So I tell you here: thank you! -- [[User:Bwijn\|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn\|talk]]) 13:36, 29 April 2016 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:55, 10 February 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==Removed Categories and Templates==
	Hey Medar, just wondering what happened to all the categories and templates that are up for deletion. Where they never used, or were they used before but now are no longer needed? [[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:23, 10 February 2016 (CET)		Hey Medar, just wondering what happened to all the categories and templates that are up for deletion. Where they never used, or were they used before but now are no longer needed? [[User:Flun\|Flun]] ([[User talk:Flun\|talk]]) 14:23, 10 February 2016 (CET)
		+	:Most of them appear to have been used by old versions of monster pages. Some properties have been removed. Some use different names ("No HT wand" vs. "No high tier wand" etc.). There are bunch of other unused templates that I didn't mark for removal, mostly for monster glyphs, see: [[Special:UnusedTemplates]] -- [[User:Medar\|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar\|talk]]) 16:55, 10 February 2016 (CET)