Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wizardry"
Patrick2011b (talk | contribs) (Discord says the wiki is wrong on what wizardry does) |
m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET) | A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. [[User:Patrick2011b|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b|talk]]) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET) | ||
| + | :I've found the correct formula and added it. [[User:Patrick2011b|Patrick2011b]] ([[User talk:Patrick2011b|talk]]) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::EDIT: Nevermind, I can't do math, that's what i get for being a wiki editor haha. (For future readers, wiz x3 = 0.6 and not 0.5) [[User:Hordes|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes|talk]]) 05:46, 27 November 2023 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:21, 27 November 2023
A removal of the wizardry cap was added to trunk today, and this was followed by a discussion on Discord where the wiki was discovered to be wrong on the effectiveness of rings of wizardry. I wasn't able to confirm the correct formula, so I'll just add the CBA for now and make a note in the edit summary in addition to here. Patrick2011b (talk) 23:13, 26 November 2023 (CET)
- I've found the correct formula and added it. Patrick2011b (talk) 23:54, 26 November 2023 (CET)
- I'm pretty sure the formula was "essentially" correct for the versions it pertained to. That is, wiz x 1 = x0.75 RFR, wiz x 2 = x0.66... RFR, and wiz x 3 = x0.50 RFR. Since the cap was x0.50, vehumet was always 2 sources of wizardry. (Of course, the trunk change would make Vehumet's part incorrect.)
