Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spell Success"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? ~~~~")
 
(Yes)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 02:59, 27 March 2015 (CET)
 
Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 02:59, 27 March 2015 (CET)
 +
 +
Yes there is. Higher spell success but lower spell power. The question is whether to call it a good mutation or a bad one. It's pretty awesome for hybrid characters that need utility spells online, yet it sucks for pure casters who need spell power for damage. --[[User:Fambida|Fambida]] ([[User talk:Fambida|talk]]) 18:17, 27 March 2015 (CET)

Revision as of 18:17, 27 March 2015

Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? --spudwalt (talk) 02:59, 27 March 2015 (CET)

Yes there is. Higher spell success but lower spell power. The question is whether to call it a good mutation or a bad one. It's pretty awesome for hybrid characters that need utility spells online, yet it sucks for pure casters who need spell power for damage. --Fambida (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2015 (CET)