Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ring of stealth"
(→code dive needed: new section) |
m (-typo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== code dive needed == | == code dive needed == | ||
| − | I've been gaming [[0.15]] and stumbled upon these two new rings ([[ring of loudness]] the other). The stealth ring is clearly a candidate for putting away as the slot is needed. The usefulness is doubtable. - OTOH I tried it out and found the ring boosted [[stealth]] from 'quite | + | I've been gaming [[0.15]] and stumbled upon these two new rings ([[ring of loudness]] the other). The stealth ring is clearly a candidate for putting away as the slot is needed. The usefulness is doubtable. - OTOH I tried it out and found the ring boosted [[stealth]] from 'quite stealthy' to 'very stealthy'. This is equivalent to ~+50 or +40. To be sure about the parameter some code diving is necessary. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 17:16, 24 September 2014 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 16:17, 24 September 2014
code dive needed
I've been gaming 0.15 and stumbled upon these two new rings (ring of loudness the other). The stealth ring is clearly a candidate for putting away as the slot is needed. The usefulness is doubtable. - OTOH I tried it out and found the ring boosted stealth from 'quite stealthy' to 'very stealthy'. This is equivalent to ~+50 or +40. To be sure about the parameter some code diving is necessary. -- Bwijn (talk) 17:16, 24 September 2014 (CEST)
