Difference between revisions of "Talk:0.18"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Remarks on 0.18 developments: new section)
 
(noticed wrong statements)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I'm rather disappointed by the new ideas of the 0.18 developers. For example: random artifacts (BTW very rare) that destruct themselves when put aside ... horrible! The DCSS game takes a self-destructive course IMHO. I'll probably leave it if it comes even more so. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 16:18, 7 April 2016 (CEST)
 
I'm rather disappointed by the new ideas of the 0.18 developers. For example: random artifacts (BTW very rare) that destruct themselves when put aside ... horrible! The DCSS game takes a self-destructive course IMHO. I'll probably leave it if it comes even more so. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 16:18, 7 April 2016 (CEST)
 +
 +
== noticed wrong statements  ==
 +
 +
The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have [[Conjure Flame]] in its spellset. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
 +
:They did, but those articles were automatically updated when [[Module:Table of monsters]] was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - [[User:Edsrzf|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf|talk]]) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
 +
::It would be nice if content generated from data would include source version somehow. Of course it shouldn't take out much space. -- [[User:Medar|Medar]] ([[User talk:Medar|talk]]) 07:05, 11 May 2016 (CEST)
 +
:::Yeah, right now we're at this strange sort of in-between stage where most monster articles are actually up to date, but the version tags haven't been updated. I would like to improve the state of things somehow; I'm just not sure of the best approach. - [[User:Edsrzf|Edsrzf]] ([[User talk:Edsrzf|talk]]) 22:28, 11 May 2016 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 21:28, 11 May 2016

Remarks on 0.18 developments

I'm rather disappointed by the new ideas of the 0.18 developers. For example: random artifacts (BTW very rare) that destruct themselves when put aside ... horrible! The DCSS game takes a self-destructive course IMHO. I'll probably leave it if it comes even more so. -- Bwijn (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2016 (CEST)

noticed wrong statements

The statement "Natasha, deep elf knights, and salamander stormcallers can no longer cast Conjure Flame." is nonsense. Not even one of the three did have Conjure Flame in its spellset. -- Bwijn (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2016 (CEST)

They did, but those articles were automatically updated when Module:Table of monsters was regenerated for 0.18. That's probably what caused your confusion. - Edsrzf (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2016 (CEST)
It would be nice if content generated from data would include source version somehow. Of course it shouldn't take out much space. -- Medar (talk) 07:05, 11 May 2016 (CEST)
Yeah, right now we're at this strange sort of in-between stage where most monster articles are actually up to date, but the version tags haven't been updated. I would like to improve the state of things somehow; I'm just not sure of the best approach. - Edsrzf (talk) 22:28, 11 May 2016 (CEST)