Difference between revisions of "Talk:Igni Ipthes"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "I agree that this page should be removed. This patch only ever made it on two servers as far as I know (CSZO and LLD, CSZO has been shut down) and it's not possible to play it...")
 
(+1 for stub deletion)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I agree that this page should be removed. This patch only ever made it on two servers as far as I know (CSZO and LLD, CSZO has been shut down) and it's not possible to play it anymore since development is on indefinite hiatus. Furthermore, the page contains barely any details so I we decide to keep it, someone would need to update to provide at least basic information. If that is even possible at the moment is uncertain since the only way AFAIK is to merge the patch manually into current master branch or play it on an older version. --[[User:JStrange|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange|talk]]) 16:34, 29 May 2016 (CEST)
 
I agree that this page should be removed. This patch only ever made it on two servers as far as I know (CSZO and LLD, CSZO has been shut down) and it's not possible to play it anymore since development is on indefinite hiatus. Furthermore, the page contains barely any details so I we decide to keep it, someone would need to update to provide at least basic information. If that is even possible at the moment is uncertain since the only way AFAIK is to merge the patch manually into current master branch or play it on an older version. --[[User:JStrange|JStrange]] ([[User talk:JStrange|talk]]) 16:34, 29 May 2016 (CEST)
 +
:And I also do consent to the proposal of deletion for this embarassing stub. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 17:33, 29 May 2016 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 16:33, 29 May 2016

I agree that this page should be removed. This patch only ever made it on two servers as far as I know (CSZO and LLD, CSZO has been shut down) and it's not possible to play it anymore since development is on indefinite hiatus. Furthermore, the page contains barely any details so I we decide to keep it, someone would need to update to provide at least basic information. If that is even possible at the moment is uncertain since the only way AFAIK is to merge the patch manually into current master branch or play it on an older version. --JStrange (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2016 (CEST)

And I also do consent to the proposal of deletion for this embarassing stub. -- Bwijn (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2016 (CEST)