Difference between revisions of "Talk:Merfolk impaler"
m |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:For now I just put: | :For now I just put: | ||
| − | :> monsters had hidden weapon penalties (they attacked slower). | + | |
| − | :Re: 0.27 penalties, I worry that listing a note like this might be overkill, since it applies to ''every'' monster with a weapon (who wasn't nerfed to compensate). But at the same time, having sharpshooters attack 20-30% faster is quite relevant. [[User:Hordes|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes|talk]]) 22:02, 28 September 2023 (CEST) | + | :> Prior to 0.27, monsters had hidden weapon penalties (they attacked slower). |
| + | |||
| + | :Re: 0.27 penalties, I worry that listing a note like this might be overkill, since it applies to ''every'' monster with a weapon (who wasn't nerfed to compensate). But at the same time, having sharpshooters (and other monsters) attack 20-30% faster is quite relevant. [[User:Hordes|Hordes]] ([[User talk:Hordes|talk]]) 22:02, 28 September 2023 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:05, 28 September 2023
0.27 history note
Naga sharpshooter has this in History:
> monsters had hidden weapon penalties (they attacked slower), which made naga sharpshooters less dangerous.
and it makes sense.
On the other hand, Merfolk (monster) and Merfolk impaler have this in History:
> monsters had hidden weapon penalties (they attacked slower), which made merfolk/merfolk impaler more dangerous.
and it doesn't make sense.
It'd be great to clarify/correct these notes, as they are quite confusing right now.
Ge0ff (talk) 21:05, 28 September 2023 (CEST)
- For now I just put:
- > Prior to 0.27, monsters had hidden weapon penalties (they attacked slower).
- Re: 0.27 penalties, I worry that listing a note like this might be overkill, since it applies to every monster with a weapon (who wasn't nerfed to compensate). But at the same time, having sharpshooters (and other monsters) attack 20-30% faster is quite relevant. Hordes (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2023 (CEST)
