Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Monsterlink"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This should be useful for those lists with pictures, but I don't think we should use them for monster links within sentences or paragraphs. --[[User:Flun|Flun]] 22:30, 14 June 2013 (CEST) | This should be useful for those lists with pictures, but I don't think we should use them for monster links within sentences or paragraphs. --[[User:Flun|Flun]] 22:30, 14 June 2013 (CEST) | ||
:Would it be feasible to also include an individual creature's glyph for those people who don't play tiles? Seems like that would take a lot of coding, though... [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 23:20, 14 June 2013 (CEST) | :Would it be feasible to also include an individual creature's glyph for those people who don't play tiles? Seems like that would take a lot of coding, though... [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 23:20, 14 June 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | :: Do you mean the ASCII tile and color? I thought of that but I don't think its possible to automatically figure out what tile and color it would be. You'd still have to enter that info as an argument to the template. --[[User:Flun|Flun]] 06:27, 15 June 2013 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 05:27, 15 June 2013
This should be useful for those lists with pictures, but I don't think we should use them for monster links within sentences or paragraphs. --Flun 22:30, 14 June 2013 (CEST)
- Would it be feasible to also include an individual creature's glyph for those people who don't play tiles? Seems like that would take a lot of coding, though... --spudwalt 23:20, 14 June 2013 (CEST)
- Do you mean the ASCII tile and color? I thought of that but I don't think its possible to automatically figure out what tile and color it would be. You'd still have to enter that info as an argument to the template. --Flun 06:27, 15 June 2013 (CEST)
