Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Skill aptitudes"
(Bump; anybody else have an opinion?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It's particularlly ''cool'' information; and provides a frame of reference (especially for Spellcasting/Stealth/Invo). If nothing else, it makes the section less empty | It's particularlly ''cool'' information; and provides a frame of reference (especially for Spellcasting/Stealth/Invo). If nothing else, it makes the section less empty | ||
[[User:Hordes|--Hordes]] | [[User:Hordes|--Hordes]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Not sure the section has any issue with being "empty", exactly. Without the average aptitude calculation, it's an infobox with maybe a couple lines about colored Draconians, which I think is enough. Average aptitude is canonically 0, anyways -- what's it matter what the arbitrary average of existing species is? | ||
| + | :Anybody else want to weigh in on this? [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 07:18, 5 August 2021 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 06:18, 5 August 2021
Do we need the average skill aptitudes? That seems like it's not particularly relevant or useful information. --spudwalt (talk) 08:07, 11 July 2021 (CEST)
It's particularlly cool information; and provides a frame of reference (especially for Spellcasting/Stealth/Invo). If nothing else, it makes the section less empty --Hordes
- Not sure the section has any issue with being "empty", exactly. Without the average aptitude calculation, it's an infobox with maybe a couple lines about colored Draconians, which I think is enough. Average aptitude is canonically 0, anyways -- what's it matter what the arbitrary average of existing species is?
- Anybody else want to weigh in on this? --spudwalt (talk) 07:18, 5 August 2021 (CEST)
