Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spell Success"
(Created page with "Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? ~~~~") |
(Yes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 02:59, 27 March 2015 (CET) | Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 02:59, 27 March 2015 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes there is. Higher spell success but lower spell power. The question is whether to call it a good mutation or a bad one. It's pretty awesome for hybrid characters that need utility spells online, yet it sucks for pure casters who need spell power for damage. --[[User:Fambida|Fambida]] ([[User talk:Fambida|talk]]) 18:17, 27 March 2015 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 27 March 2015
Isn't there also a Placid Magic mutation that can affect spell success? --spudwalt (talk) 02:59, 27 March 2015 (CET)
Yes there is. Higher spell success but lower spell power. The question is whether to call it a good mutation or a bad one. It's pretty awesome for hybrid characters that need utility spells online, yet it sucks for pure casters who need spell power for damage. --Fambida (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2015 (CET)
