Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stats"
(need to investigate if the stats are correct) |
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Possible issue with nagas - it seems tat the stats are incorrect for them. NaWz is getting 9/18/9 as stats upon beginning | Possible issue with nagas - it seems tat the stats are incorrect for them. NaWz is getting 9/18/9 as stats upon beginning | ||
| + | |||
| + | :If I had access to a machine with the offline version installed, I'd just start running nagas and see if I could determine the actual modifiers that way, but I suspect a code diver could figure it out without spread sheet crunching. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 14:14, 27 March 2014 (CET) | ||
| + | :disregard this, it is "2 + specie stats + class stats" so this way it is perfectly nice. on the other hand, for the sace of clarity it might be easier to just put already adjusted numbers into the table | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Seconded on putting the +2 into the stats. I originally left it out because that's how it was in the source code and the learndb (it was a remnant of randomized stats), but it actually has since been changed on both I believe. Definitely on the learndb, and it's probably best to be consistent with that. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] ([[User talk:Ion frigate|talk]]) 01:55, 28 March 2014 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:55, 28 March 2014
Possible issue with nagas - it seems tat the stats are incorrect for them. NaWz is getting 9/18/9 as stats upon beginning
- If I had access to a machine with the offline version installed, I'd just start running nagas and see if I could determine the actual modifiers that way, but I suspect a code diver could figure it out without spread sheet crunching. --MoogleDan (talk) 14:14, 27 March 2014 (CET)
- disregard this, it is "2 + specie stats + class stats" so this way it is perfectly nice. on the other hand, for the sace of clarity it might be easier to just put already adjusted numbers into the table
- Seconded on putting the +2 into the stats. I originally left it out because that's how it was in the source code and the learndb (it was a remnant of randomized stats), but it actually has since been changed on both I believe. Definitely on the learndb, and it's probably best to be consistent with that. -Ion frigate (talk) 01:55, 28 March 2014 (CET)
