Difference between revisions of "Talk:Constriction"
(Created page with "I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all in...") |
(reply to spudwalt) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST) | I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the [[Held]] condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | :Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 17:09, 1 May 2014
I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the Held condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). --spudwalt (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)
