Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scythe"
(Created page with "You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --~~~~") |
m (→0.29 scythe "removal": re: "removal") |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --[[User:Haelyn|Haelyn]] ([[User talk:Haelyn|talk]]) 03:08, 6 July 2016 (CEST) | You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --[[User:Haelyn|Haelyn]] ([[User talk:Haelyn|talk]]) 03:08, 6 July 2016 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == 0.29 scythe "removal" == | ||
+ | |||
+ | As title states, Scythes became reskinned halberds (and hammers return). Not sure how to deal with it on a wiki sense. | ||
+ | |||
+ | : It's an implementation detail that scythes and hammers are reskinned weapons. From the players' perspective, scythes are still in the game. It'd be enough to | ||
+ | *add a link to halberds/maces at the top of the scythe/hammer articles; | ||
+ | *move the <nowiki>{{weapon}}</nowiki> box with the old stats into History, as we do for obsolete player spells (e.g., [[Repel Missiles]]). [[User:Ge0ff|Ge0ff]] ([[User talk:Ge0ff|talk]]) 01:36, 23 August 2022 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 00:36, 23 August 2022
You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --Haelyn (talk) 03:08, 6 July 2016 (CEST)
0.29 scythe "removal"
As title states, Scythes became reskinned halberds (and hammers return). Not sure how to deal with it on a wiki sense.
- It's an implementation detail that scythes and hammers are reskinned weapons. From the players' perspective, scythes are still in the game. It'd be enough to
- add a link to halberds/maces at the top of the scythe/hammer articles;
- move the {{weapon}} box with the old stats into History, as we do for obsolete player spells (e.g., Repel Missiles). Ge0ff (talk) 01:36, 23 August 2022 (CEST)