Difference between revisions of "Talk:Staff of Wucad Mu"
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) |
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET) | ::Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET) | ||
::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET) | ::No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET) | ||
− | :::Sure. Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description. One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET) | + | :::Sure. Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description). One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET) |
Revision as of 00:46, 24 February 2013
I found an "ephemeral staff" at the Bazaar for a decent price. It's the Staff of Wucad Mu, which is quite difficult to evaluate. A very rarely appearing item, high risk of miscast effects and no reliable use. - Why is the "unidentified name" not part of the crawl wiki text? Is it a random and not a fixed name? -- Bwijn 19:29, 23 February 2013 (CET)
- Are you playing an old version? I thought that as of 0.11, all unrands would be identified on sight, making the un-ID'd description irrelevant. Anyway, the un-ID'd descriptions are actually in pretty much all of the unrand articles, but these four staves already had articles written a while ago which don't mention the descriptions. If the un-ID'd description was found in 0.11 feel free to add it. -Ion frigate 22:20, 23 February 2013 (CET)
- Oh, and if you're a caster it's worth buying. -Ion frigate 22:21, 23 February 2013 (CET)
- No, you're right, I prefered a 10.3 game. The graphics and the odds IMHO are better. - Shouldn't we add a history chapter for obsoleted details like that? Even the online servers don't offer solely 0.11 version games. -- Bwijn 00:31, 24 February 2013 (CET)
- Sure. Ideally, we should actually write history sections like that for all the unrand articles (currently, it gives the un-ID'd appearance in the main description). One thing I'm not sure, though, is whether or not that appearance might still appear when you examine the artefact in 0.11+ - it might. -Ion frigate 00:46, 24 February 2013 (CET)