Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wind drake"
CommanderC (talk | contribs) |
(→Deflecting effects: reply to CommanderC) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:The logic is: if it checks your EV, then it can be deflected. --[[User:CommanderC|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC|talk]]) 20:39, 27 September 2013 (CEST) | :The logic is: if it checks your EV, then it can be deflected. --[[User:CommanderC|CommanderC]] ([[User talk:CommanderC|talk]]) 20:39, 27 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I don't catch your reply. Sure, deflection happens by checking EV. - My complaint/talk was about the miserable equation 'energy = missile' logic. Surely, 'e = m x c²' (Einstein). But we don't have any light velocity so the equation doesn't fit at all. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 21:19, 27 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 27 September 2013
Deflecting effects
I just had to learn - ouch this sort of "logic" hurts - that a wand of draining (negative energy) counts as "missiles" which are deflected completely. -- Bwijn (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2013 (CEST)
- The logic is: if it checks your EV, then it can be deflected. --CommanderC (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2013 (CEST)
