Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sif Muna"
(Close, but not quite...) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:As far as I can tell Sif hasn`t been changed much: the skills (channel, amnesia and miscast protect) and spellbook-gifts are still there for 0.15 as well as not accepting the ignorant. I can`t say anything about the specific numbers, but I didn`t notice any changes in the average amount of MP channeled and when Sif starts to gift books. There wasn't any mention of Sif in the changelogs, so I think Sif is unchanged. --[[User:BlueCrake|BlueCrake]] ([[User talk:BlueCrake|talk]]) 13:26, 21 August 2014 (CEST) | :As far as I can tell Sif hasn`t been changed much: the skills (channel, amnesia and miscast protect) and spellbook-gifts are still there for 0.15 as well as not accepting the ignorant. I can`t say anything about the specific numbers, but I didn`t notice any changes in the average amount of MP channeled and when Sif starts to gift books. There wasn't any mention of Sif in the changelogs, so I think Sif is unchanged. --[[User:BlueCrake|BlueCrake]] ([[User talk:BlueCrake|talk]]) 13:26, 21 August 2014 (CEST) | ||
::Actually, do a CTRL+F on the change log. She's in there. It says that she no longer inflicts amnesia. I'm not sure if that was suggesting that she no longer allows you to forget spells at will (which would be a weird nerf to add), or that she no longer blasts your memorized spells in her wrath (the phrasing makes this sound more likely, in which case we're doubly screwed because we never even had that listed in her wraths in the first place). I think she's probably ''mostly'' the same nerdy bookish library goddess we've always known and loved, but I want specifics, dammit. What's the point of a wiki that can't provide needlessly in-depth calculations??!? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 13:50, 21 August 2014 (CEST) | ::Actually, do a CTRL+F on the change log. She's in there. It says that she no longer inflicts amnesia. I'm not sure if that was suggesting that she no longer allows you to forget spells at will (which would be a weird nerf to add), or that she no longer blasts your memorized spells in her wrath (the phrasing makes this sound more likely, in which case we're doubly screwed because we never even had that listed in her wraths in the first place). I think she's probably ''mostly'' the same nerdy bookish library goddess we've always known and loved, but I want specifics, dammit. What's the point of a wiki that can't provide needlessly in-depth calculations??!? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 13:50, 21 August 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | :::As always, CC, fantastic work! --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 15:55, 21 August 2014 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 21 August 2014
This page has never had a version tag applied to it, and it's one of the pages I've been least confident about updating (I'm a much bigger fan of Vehumet's style, TBH). I have no idea how out-of-date and inaccurate this page actually is. Can anyone who honestly feels confident about Sif Muna's behavior update this page for 0.14 or 0.15? If you can fill in a History section as well, that'd be even better. Code diving for specific mechanics behavior welcome. --MoogleDan (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2014 (CEST)
- As far as I can tell Sif hasn`t been changed much: the skills (channel, amnesia and miscast protect) and spellbook-gifts are still there for 0.15 as well as not accepting the ignorant. I can`t say anything about the specific numbers, but I didn`t notice any changes in the average amount of MP channeled and when Sif starts to gift books. There wasn't any mention of Sif in the changelogs, so I think Sif is unchanged. --BlueCrake (talk) 13:26, 21 August 2014 (CEST)
- Actually, do a CTRL+F on the change log. She's in there. It says that she no longer inflicts amnesia. I'm not sure if that was suggesting that she no longer allows you to forget spells at will (which would be a weird nerf to add), or that she no longer blasts your memorized spells in her wrath (the phrasing makes this sound more likely, in which case we're doubly screwed because we never even had that listed in her wraths in the first place). I think she's probably mostly the same nerdy bookish library goddess we've always known and loved, but I want specifics, dammit. What's the point of a wiki that can't provide needlessly in-depth calculations??!? --MoogleDan (talk) 13:50, 21 August 2014 (CEST)
