Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spider Form"
(Created page with "Ambiguous wording: what does this mean? Can it be improved? "Can be negated with a source of poison resistance, but it's impossible to be resistant to poison." --~~~~") |
(reply) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ambiguous wording: what does this mean? Can it be improved? | Ambiguous wording: what does this mean? Can it be improved? | ||
− | "Can be negated with a source of poison resistance, but it's impossible to be resistant to poison." | + | "Can be negated with a source of poison resistance, but it's impossible to be resistant to poison." --[[User:Chikinn|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn|talk]]) 00:10, 20 August 2016 (CEST) |
− | --[[User:Chikinn|Chikinn]] ([[User talk:Chikinn|talk]]) 00:10, 20 August 2016 (CEST) | + | :That's easy enough: the current DCSS concept of poison resistance is that Rpois is not covering 100% but reducing the shelter to only ~2/3. So "it's impossible to be resistant to poison" absolutely. But it's indeed crucial to survival to obtain a source of Rpois if not being generically immune to poison. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 22:08, 20 August 2016 (CEST) |
Revision as of 21:08, 20 August 2016
Ambiguous wording: what does this mean? Can it be improved? "Can be negated with a source of poison resistance, but it's impossible to be resistant to poison." --Chikinn (talk) 00:10, 20 August 2016 (CEST)
- That's easy enough: the current DCSS concept of poison resistance is that Rpois is not covering 100% but reducing the shelter to only ~2/3. So "it's impossible to be resistant to poison" absolutely. But it's indeed crucial to survival to obtain a source of Rpois if not being generically immune to poison. -- Bwijn (talk) 22:08, 20 August 2016 (CEST)