Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Egos"
(some mix-up in egos) |
m (→Some clean up would be fine: fixed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Some clean up would be fine == | == Some clean up would be fine == | ||
| − | There is some mix-up in egos: mostly effects and some objects categorized. When now in [[0.14]] the unrandart [[Hat of the High Council]] will be added, no longer [[Archmagi]] should be redirected to [[Robe of Archmagi]]. And [[Darkness]] surely is not only to be met in the cloak but more frequently in randarts. Egos should only contain the effects, no longer objects. Some clean up would be fine. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 15:16, 15 February 2014 (CET) | + | There is some mix-up in egos: mostly effects and some objects categorized. When now in [[0.14]] the unrandart [[Hat of the High Council]] will be added, no longer [[Archmagi]] should be redirected to [[Robe of the Archmagi]]. And [[Darkness]] surely is not only to be met in the cloak but more frequently in randarts. Egos should only contain the effects, no longer objects. Some clean up would be fine. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 15:16, 15 February 2014 (CET) |
Latest revision as of 15:17, 15 February 2014
Some clean up would be fine
There is some mix-up in egos: mostly effects and some objects categorized. When now in 0.14 the unrandart Hat of the High Council will be added, no longer Archmagi should be redirected to Robe of the Archmagi. And Darkness surely is not only to be met in the cloak but more frequently in randarts. Egos should only contain the effects, no longer objects. Some clean up would be fine. -- Bwijn (talk) 15:16, 15 February 2014 (CET)
