Talk:Djinni
I wonder why they didn't just call these guys "efreets" since that's basically what they are. Not that that will stop me from trying at least a few of them when 0.13 comes out. :) --spudwalt 21:43, 2 June 2013 (CEST)
- Efreets (correct plural is actually afarit) are basically just a race of evil jinn. So it makes more sense to go with the more general (d)jinni. Of course, dropping the initial d would also help, since that's a fairly archaic transliteration convention. -Ion frigate 02:29, 3 June 2013 (CEST)
Are these permanent?
Just a quick question: is it already decided that the new species (and other features like the new monsters) will be in the release version of 0.13, or are they implemented for testing? I'm pretty new to the updating process, as I previously ignored trunk because of the warning that it might be 'unstable'. --Lokkij 22:39, 2 June 2013 (CEST)
- They have been implemented for testing, and I think the idea is if there is no serious problems they will keep them in for the next release. Trunk is still unstable in the sense that there might be bugs related to the species, as well as balance changes that wouldn't occur in a release version. --Flun 03:44, 3 June 2013 (CEST)
Help explaining the Djinn magic aptitude
I wrote the following:
Also due to how XP costs work, Djinn can be much better than a "-3 aptitude" would indicate.
XP cost rises as level rises. This has an odd effect when considering Djinn's casting aptitude. Take, for example, a single-school Conjurations spell:
- A Kobold has +0 aptitudes in Spellcasting and Conjurations. If you only cared about spell power/failure, a Kobold would be most efficient a point like {5 Spellcasting, 15 Conjurations}. This would cost 72.75 skill points.
- A Djinni would reach the same power as the Kobold at {13 Spellcasting}, all else equal. This would cost 80.72 skill points, which is only +11.7% more XP than the Kobold. That's an effective aptitude of -0.6, much better than -3 appears.
- Note that if the Kobold were to train more Spellcasting, for either MP or spell level purposes, they'd become less efficient. A Kobold at {10 Spellcasting, 13.5 Conjurations} would get the same power, but at a cost of 79.13 skill points.
For dual-school spells, Djinn only become better. For casting Fireball, a Kobold would be efficient at {8 Spellcasting, 15 Fire, 15 Conj}, costing 153 skill points. A Djinni equals that at {13.6 Spellcasting}, or 89.05 skill points, which is 58% the XP. That's an effective aptitude of +3.
The exact efficiency depends on the level of skill. At low skill levels, Djinn are truly around a -3 aptitude for single-school spells. At XL 27, Djinn can be cheaper than Kobolds, even for single-school spells.
I wonder if it could be explained better? Hordes (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2023 (CET)
