Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cigotuvi's embrace"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Fixing style/layout errors)
(+details)
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm curious what the solving of this riddle. The final change log of [[0.26]] says that rotting is no more. That would logically mean that an unrand's base feature is [[Resistance#Minor Resistances|rRot]] lost its reason to be. Possibly it becomes an exception like in many other unrands. The riddle consists of the fact that the change log author actually forgot to mention which way the developers want to pursue for this unrand artifact. --[[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 11:21, 12 January 2021 (CET)
+
I'm curious about the solving of this riddle. The final change log of [[0.26]] says that rotting as a conception is no more. That would logically mean that an unrand's base feature is [[Resistance#Minor Resistances|rRot]] lost its reason to be. Possibly it becomes an exception like in many other unrands. The riddle consists of the fact that the change log author actually forgot to mention which way the developers want to pursue for this unrand artifact (introduced just recently in [[0.25]]). --[[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 11:21, 12 January 2021 (CET)

Revision as of 12:32, 12 January 2021

I'm curious about the solving of this riddle. The final change log of 0.26 says that rotting as a conception is no more. That would logically mean that an unrand's base feature is rRot lost its reason to be. Possibly it becomes an exception like in many other unrands. The riddle consists of the fact that the change log author actually forgot to mention which way the developers want to pursue for this unrand artifact (introduced just recently in 0.25). --Bwijn (talk) 11:21, 12 January 2021 (CET)