Difference between revisions of "Talk:Scythe"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --~~~~")
 
m (0.29 scythe "removal": re: "removal")
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --[[User:Haelyn|Haelyn]] ([[User talk:Haelyn|talk]]) 03:08, 6 July 2016 (CEST)
 
You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --[[User:Haelyn|Haelyn]] ([[User talk:Haelyn|talk]]) 03:08, 6 July 2016 (CEST)
 +
 +
== 0.29 scythe "removal" ==
 +
 +
As title states, Scythes became reskinned halberds (and hammers return). Not sure how to deal with it on a wiki sense.
 +
 +
: It's an implementation detail that scythes and hammers are reskinned weapons. From the players' perspective, scythes are still in the game. It'd be enough to
 +
*add a link to halberds/maces at the top of the scythe/hammer articles;
 +
*move the <nowiki>{{weapon}}</nowiki> box with the old stats into History, as we do for obsolete player spells (e.g., [[Repel Missiles]]). [[User:Ge0ff|Ge0ff]] ([[User talk:Ge0ff|talk]]) 01:36, 23 August 2022 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 01:36, 23 August 2022

You know what? This needs cleaving. Makes aesthetic sense and it would make it not unwanted. --Haelyn (talk) 03:08, 6 July 2016 (CEST)

0.29 scythe "removal"

As title states, Scythes became reskinned halberds (and hammers return). Not sure how to deal with it on a wiki sense.

It's an implementation detail that scythes and hammers are reskinned weapons. From the players' perspective, scythes are still in the game. It'd be enough to
  • add a link to halberds/maces at the top of the scythe/hammer articles;
  • move the {{weapon}} box with the old stats into History, as we do for obsolete player spells (e.g., Repel Missiles). Ge0ff (talk) 01:36, 23 August 2022 (CEST)