Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Royal Jelly"
Kernmantle (talk | contribs) (→Draining TRJ: new section) |
m (Spudwalt moved page Talk:The royal jelly to Talk:The Royal Jelly: using proper capitalization) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Why'd you remove Draining suggestion for TRJ? It works. | Why'd you remove Draining suggestion for TRJ? It works. | ||
| − | If you can only get TRJ to a certain point before you have to retreat, you can drain it each attack until, little by little, | + | If you can only get TRJ to a certain point before you have to retreat, you can drain it each attack until, little by little, its HP gets into your damage range. |
--[[User:Kernmantle|Kernmantle]] ([[User talk:Kernmantle|talk]]) 21:15, 21 February 2014 (CET) | --[[User:Kernmantle|Kernmantle]] ([[User talk:Kernmantle|talk]]) 21:15, 21 February 2014 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I added that a while back after pulling it off a couple times, and it does work well enough, true. I'd burn through all of my wand of draining inventory right before switching to TSO. Thinking it over today I was trying to decide if it was worth keeping since it IS a very slow method, but hey, if you think the method's worth keeping around, I'll pop it back in. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 21:19, 21 February 2014 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thanks. --[[User:Kernmantle|Kernmantle]] ([[User talk:Kernmantle|talk]]) 21:27, 21 February 2014 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:14, 3 December 2019
Draining TRJ
Why'd you remove Draining suggestion for TRJ? It works.
If you can only get TRJ to a certain point before you have to retreat, you can drain it each attack until, little by little, its HP gets into your damage range. --Kernmantle (talk) 21:15, 21 February 2014 (CET)
- I added that a while back after pulling it off a couple times, and it does work well enough, true. I'd burn through all of my wand of draining inventory right before switching to TSO. Thinking it over today I was trying to decide if it was worth keeping since it IS a very slow method, but hey, if you think the method's worth keeping around, I'll pop it back in. --MoogleDan (talk) 21:19, 21 February 2014 (CET)
- Thanks. --Kernmantle (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2014 (CET)
