Difference between revisions of "Talk:Octopode"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(shield logic?: found: carrying a Rod of Warding is enough)
(Difficulty of Play: new section)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
How come that you can train [[shield]]s as an octopode without even having one (not even [[condensation shield]])? Do tentacles count as natural shield as well? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 09:28, 9 March 2013 (CET)
 
How come that you can train [[shield]]s as an octopode without even having one (not even [[condensation shield]])? Do tentacles count as natural shield as well? -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 09:28, 9 March 2013 (CET)
 
:Oops, I got it myself: carrying a [[Rod of Warding]] is enough to make you train-worthy. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 09:45, 9 March 2013 (CET)
 
:Oops, I got it myself: carrying a [[Rod of Warding]] is enough to make you train-worthy. -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 09:45, 9 March 2013 (CET)
 +
 +
== Difficulty of Play ==
 +
 +
IMO the present profile "easy" in "Difficulty of Play" is completely wrong. It should be "hard". Octopodes have (like merfolk) the aquatic advantage in the branches [[Shoals]], [[Swamp]] and [[Abyss]] (free escape routes, no water delay). The availability of "wish list" [[ring]]s is mostly *very bad* for a long stretch of road in early and mid game. To get a decent [[wizard hat]] or randart [[buckler]] (the only possible armour pieces) you probably need to use several scrolls of acquirement. [[Resistance]]s are a big problem. - Your trump is a high stealth value ([[Aptitude]] of "3") as soon as possible so you can assasinate most menacing brutes. Sum up: quite difficult to survive as an octopode character! -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] 12:53, 3 April 2013 (CEST)

Revision as of 11:53, 3 April 2013

shield logic?

How come that you can train shields as an octopode without even having one (not even condensation shield)? Do tentacles count as natural shield as well? -- Bwijn 09:28, 9 March 2013 (CET)

Oops, I got it myself: carrying a Rod of Warding is enough to make you train-worthy. -- Bwijn 09:45, 9 March 2013 (CET)

Difficulty of Play

IMO the present profile "easy" in "Difficulty of Play" is completely wrong. It should be "hard". Octopodes have (like merfolk) the aquatic advantage in the branches Shoals, Swamp and Abyss (free escape routes, no water delay). The availability of "wish list" rings is mostly *very bad* for a long stretch of road in early and mid game. To get a decent wizard hat or randart buckler (the only possible armour pieces) you probably need to use several scrolls of acquirement. Resistances are a big problem. - Your trump is a high stealth value (Aptitude of "3") as soon as possible so you can assasinate most menacing brutes. Sum up: quite difficult to survive as an octopode character! -- Bwijn 12:53, 3 April 2013 (CEST)