Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battlesphere"
m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Here's some names that I think get the idea across while still reducing letter count nicely. I also think that the order should be uniform for all monsters, and that we should put the common items first before getting to the more exotic items | :Here's some names that I think get the idea across while still reducing letter count nicely. I also think that the order should be uniform for all monsters, and that we should put the common items first before getting to the more exotic items | ||
| − | :rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rTorm -> rSticky -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil | + | :rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rTorm -> rRot -> rSticky -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil |
:For vulnerabilities, we should just display the substance the creature is vulnerable to: | :For vulnerabilities, we should just display the substance the creature is vulnerable to: | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 16:36, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | :Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 16:36, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::The ordering will always be the same, and every two resistances the bot will insert a <nowiki><br></nowiki>. Your proposal looks quite good. After 0.12 is released, we should edit all the pages in [[:Category:Resistance]] and [[:Category:Vulnerability]] according to this naming convention. --[[User:CommanderC|CommanderC]] 19:51, 18 April 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Just a quick question : can a battlesphere trigger traps? --[[User:Fingolfin|Fingolfin]] ([[User talk:Fingolfin|talk]]) 18:24, 12 April 2015 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:24, 12 April 2015
The monster template that appears on this page was generated by the bot. It did a pretty good job, but the fields which contain the resistances and vulnerabilities look a bit ugly, because the naming of the resistances and vulnerabilities is not uniform. I am not too sure which names we should be using. For example: rDrowning? Drowning? rConstrict? rConstriction?, ... I'm open to any suggestions. --CommanderC 15:42, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
- Here's some names that I think get the idea across while still reducing letter count nicely. I also think that the order should be uniform for all monsters, and that we should put the common items first before getting to the more exotic items
- rF -> rC -> rElec -> rPois -> rN -> rTorm -> rRot -> rSticky -> rAcid -> rWind -> rConstr -> rDrown -> rSil
- For vulnerabilities, we should just display the substance the creature is vulnerable to:
- Fire -> Cold -> Poison -> Holy -> Wrath -> Silver -> Orc slaying -> Dragon slaying
- Does this sound good to everyone? --MoogleDan 16:36, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
- The ordering will always be the same, and every two resistances the bot will insert a <br>. Your proposal looks quite good. After 0.12 is released, we should edit all the pages in Category:Resistance and Category:Vulnerability according to this naming convention. --CommanderC 19:51, 18 April 2013 (CEST)
Just a quick question : can a battlesphere trigger traps? --Fingolfin (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2015 (CEST)
