Difference between revisions of "Talk:Giant centipede"
m |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Yeah, except they have the 's' glyph, and we already have scorpions in the arachnid page... | ::Yeah, except they have the 's' glyph, and we already have scorpions in the arachnid page... | ||
::Maybe we should just lump everything into 'list of arthropods'. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 18:31, 15 July 2013 (CEST) | ::Maybe we should just lump everything into 'list of arthropods'. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 18:31, 15 July 2013 (CEST) | ||
+ | :::Valid point. I'll lump both lists together later today, just to avoid any further confusion. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 18:36, 15 July 2013 (CEST) | ||
+ | ::::Done! List of arachnids and List of insects are no more. Feel free to adjust the new [[list of arthropods]] as you see fit. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 22:20, 15 July 2013 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 21:20, 15 July 2013
Think these guys would go better in list of insects or list of arachnids? --spudwalt 04:25, 15 July 2013 (CEST)
- I'd dump 'em in with the insects (along with a note declaring them technically arthropods). They don't really fit in either page, but I think arachnid seems like a more specific name. --MoogleDan 14:07, 15 July 2013 (CEST)
- Yeah, except they have the 's' glyph, and we already have scorpions in the arachnid page...
- Maybe we should just lump everything into 'list of arthropods'. --spudwalt 18:31, 15 July 2013 (CEST)
- Valid point. I'll lump both lists together later today, just to avoid any further confusion. --MoogleDan 18:36, 15 July 2013 (CEST)
- Done! List of arachnids and List of insects are no more. Feel free to adjust the new list of arthropods as you see fit. --MoogleDan 22:20, 15 July 2013 (CEST)
- Valid point. I'll lump both lists together later today, just to avoid any further confusion. --MoogleDan 18:36, 15 July 2013 (CEST)