Difference between revisions of "Tower shield of Ignorance"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Desirability)
m (→‎Desirability)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{version025}}
+
{{version030}}
 
{{flavour|A shield unearthed from the remains of a ruined city. It bears an inscription written in an ancient language. Scholars and wise men laboured for countless hours to decipher it, and in time, a translation was finally settled on:
 
{{flavour|A shield unearthed from the remains of a ruined city. It bears an inscription written in an ancient language. Scholars and wise men laboured for countless hours to decipher it, and in time, a translation was finally settled on:
  
Line 7: Line 7:
 
+10 [[tower shield]]
 
+10 [[tower shield]]
  
−
-4 [[INT]]<br>
+
-4 [[Intelligence]]<br>
 
rN+
 
rN+
  
 
==Desirability==
 
==Desirability==
−
For most characters, the '''tower shield of Ignorance''' is ruled out simply by virtue of it being a [[tower shield]]; [[size|smaller]] characters can't wield it, and medium-sized characters need to invest a tremendous amount of [[experience]] into their [[Shields skill]] to mitigate the severe penalties large shields apply. Large characters and [[formicid]]s have a significantly easier time of it, but the arguments against the shield continue. -4 [[intelligence]] is a huge penalty for any spellcaster, and since any non-[[Trog]] character can benefit from learning at least a little magic, this is significant in almost all cases. Finally, while it does offer an impressive amount of shielding plus a rank of occasionally-helpful [[negative energy]] resistance, it's often more tempting to take advantage of the [[fire]], [[cold]], or [[poison]] resistances you can find on non-artefact [[buckler]]s and [[kite shield]]s.
+
The '''tower shield of Ignorance'''<ref>{{source ref|0.30.0|art-data.txt|791}}</ref> is certainly a large shield. [[Kobold]]s and [[Spriggan]]s are unable to wield it, while other species will need high Shields skill and/or strength to mitigate the shield encumbrance. The intelligence penalty only makes it harder to cast spells. However, it offers better protection than regular tower shields, and comes with a nice resistance.
  
−
However, for the fighters and non-Gnolls among you: this shield is a terrific boost to your survivability. Swinging a melee weapon, you do not have to wait until you have reached 25 in Shields to offset its penalty. The inherent +10 enchantment allows you to put all your enchant armor scrolls on your remaining armor slots. And if you have found an amulet of scarf offering reflection properties, not only will you block a lot of the projectiles fired at you by Yaktaurs and Giants, but you will send them right back to where they came from.
+
Overall, while casters and [[Gnoll]]s may want a different option, most characters who'd use a tower shield will appreciate this one. A +8 tower shield of [[resistance]] might be preferable, but you first need to find a tower shield of resistance, then use [[scrolls of enchant armour]] on it.
  
−
In summary: not a great find for a mage or a Gnoll, but definitely one for any bruiser.
+
Note that, on low Int characters, the intelligence penalty can put you in real risk of [[stat zero]]. If your character has low intelligence, wear with caution.
  
 
==History==
 
==History==
−
*Prior to [[0.25]], this was known as the large shield of Ignorance.
+
*Prior to [[0.25]], this was known as the '''large shield of Ignorance'''.
 
*Prior to [[0.20]], this shield gave +4 [[AC]], reduced intelligence by 6, and only had a +6 enchantment. Also, it had *[[Curse]] property (33% chance to recurse itself on equip).
 
*Prior to [[0.20]], this shield gave +4 [[AC]], reduced intelligence by 6, and only had a +6 enchantment. Also, it had *[[Curse]] property (33% chance to recurse itself on equip).
 
*Prior to [[0.19]], this shield had +2 [[EV]] and only a +2 [[AC]] bonus.  
 
*Prior to [[0.19]], this shield had +2 [[EV]] and only a +2 [[AC]] bonus.  
 
*Prior to [[0.15]], this shield had a +8 enchantment level.
 
*Prior to [[0.15]], this shield had a +8 enchantment level.
 +
 +
==References==
 +
<references />
  
 
[[Category:Unrands]]
 
[[Category:Unrands]]
 
[[Category:Shields]]
 
[[Category:Shields]]

Latest revision as of 20:37, 17 October 2023

Version 0.30: This article may not be up to date for the latest stable release of Crawl.
A shield unearthed from the remains of a ruined city. It bears an inscription written in an ancient language. Scholars and wise men laboured for countless hours to decipher it, and in time, a translation was finally settled on:

"With a shield like this, who needs to think?"

Shield of ignorance.png the +10 tower shield of Ignorance

+10 tower shield

-4 Intelligence
rN+

Desirability

The tower shield of Ignorance[1] is certainly a large shield. Kobolds and Spriggans are unable to wield it, while other species will need high Shields skill and/or strength to mitigate the shield encumbrance. The intelligence penalty only makes it harder to cast spells. However, it offers better protection than regular tower shields, and comes with a nice resistance.

Overall, while casters and Gnolls may want a different option, most characters who'd use a tower shield will appreciate this one. A +8 tower shield of resistance might be preferable, but you first need to find a tower shield of resistance, then use scrolls of enchant armour on it.

Note that, on low Int characters, the intelligence penalty can put you in real risk of stat zero. If your character has low intelligence, wear with caution.

History

  • Prior to 0.25, this was known as the large shield of Ignorance.
  • Prior to 0.20, this shield gave +4 AC, reduced intelligence by 6, and only had a +6 enchantment. Also, it had *Curse property (33% chance to recurse itself on equip).
  • Prior to 0.19, this shield had +2 EV and only a +2 AC bonus.
  • Prior to 0.15, this shield had a +8 enchantment level.

References

  1. ↑ art-data.txt:791 (0.30.0)
Retrieved from "http://crawl.chaosforge.org/index.php?title=Tower_shield_of_Ignorance&oldid=75630"