Difference between revisions of "File talk:Amulet of rage.png"

From CrawlWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I don't know anything about tiles. Is the position of the symbol correct? --[[User:CommanderC|CommanderC]] 22:43, 13 April 2013 (CEST)
 
I don't know anything about tiles. Is the position of the symbol correct? --[[User:CommanderC|CommanderC]] 22:43, 13 April 2013 (CEST)
 
:I think so... Basically, to get the tile for something that has a brand or an ego, you just paste the ego's tile directly on top of the object (i.e. so the dimensions match up). [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 22:59, 13 April 2013 (CEST)
 
:I think so... Basically, to get the tile for something that has a brand or an ego, you just paste the ego's tile directly on top of the object (i.e. so the dimensions match up). [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 22:59, 13 April 2013 (CEST)
 +
::I do play with tiles, and one thing I should point out is that the amulet designs will vary from game to game. We may wish to just post up the little icons without the base amulet behind it, or make sure every amulet page uses the same base amulet image, just to avoid people thinking the base amulet image tells them anything about what it does. The placement is spot-on, however : ) --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 00:47, 14 April 2013 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 00:47, 14 April 2013

I don't know anything about tiles. Is the position of the symbol correct? --CommanderC 22:43, 13 April 2013 (CEST)

I think so... Basically, to get the tile for something that has a brand or an ego, you just paste the ego's tile directly on top of the object (i.e. so the dimensions match up). --spudwalt 22:59, 13 April 2013 (CEST)
I do play with tiles, and one thing I should point out is that the amulet designs will vary from game to game. We may wish to just post up the little icons without the base amulet behind it, or make sure every amulet page uses the same base amulet image, just to avoid people thinking the base amulet image tells them anything about what it does. The placement is spot-on, however : ) --MoogleDan 00:47, 14 April 2013 (CEST)