Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wind drake"
(→Deflecting effects) |
(→Deflecting effects: allright, Spudwalt :)) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Basically, any projectile attack, be it an arrow or a beam of fire, can be bent out of the way by DMissiles. It's magic -- it doesn't have to make sense according to physics. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 23:01, 27 September 2013 (CEST) | :::Basically, any projectile attack, be it an arrow or a beam of fire, can be bent out of the way by DMissiles. It's magic -- it doesn't have to make sense according to physics. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 23:01, 27 September 2013 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::Your explanation is okay, dear Spudwalt. But sorry, I'm not easily giving up basic logic of nature's laws and language even while considering it a game. I just don't appreciate "supernatural" nonsense anywhere in my life! -- [[User:Bwijn|Bwijn]] ([[User talk:Bwijn|talk]]) 15:24, 29 September 2013 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 14:24, 29 September 2013
Deflecting effects
I just had to learn - ouch this sort of "logic" hurts - that a wand of draining (negative energy) counts as "missiles" which are deflected completely. -- Bwijn (talk) 20:10, 27 September 2013 (CEST)
- The logic is: if it checks your EV, then it can be deflected. --CommanderC (talk) 20:39, 27 September 2013 (CEST)
- Basically, any projectile attack, be it an arrow or a beam of fire, can be bent out of the way by DMissiles. It's magic -- it doesn't have to make sense according to physics. --spudwalt (talk) 23:01, 27 September 2013 (CEST)