Difference between revisions of "Talk:Spellforged Servitor"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think the closest thing we have to a precedent would be the player species / monster conflicts, and in those cases we add (monster) to the monster pages. Sound reasonable? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 15:08, 11 April 2014 (CEST) | :I think the closest thing we have to a precedent would be the player species / monster conflicts, and in those cases we add (monster) to the monster pages. Sound reasonable? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 15:08, 11 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::That was what I was thinking. And, since I'm an admin now... BAMF. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 18:56, 11 April 2014 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 17:56, 11 April 2014
We appear to be running into some problems with the tile for Spellforged Servitor. It's probably because both the spell and the monster it summons have the same name. Any ideas on how to fix it? --spudwalt (talk) 01:07, 11 April 2014 (CEST)
- I think the closest thing we have to a precedent would be the player species / monster conflicts, and in those cases we add (monster) to the monster pages. Sound reasonable? --MoogleDan (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2014 (CEST)
- That was what I was thinking. And, since I'm an admin now... BAMF. --spudwalt (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2014 (CEST)
