Difference between revisions of "Ring of strength"
(Pretty sure it doesn't affect dexterity) |
(Added Desirability) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
A '''±X ring of strength''' affects the [[strength]] of the wearer by X (ranges from +6 to -6). If X is negative, the ring is normally [[curse]]d, and it can cause [[stat zero]] if you are unable to remove it. | A '''±X ring of strength''' affects the [[strength]] of the wearer by X (ranges from +6 to -6). If X is negative, the ring is normally [[curse]]d, and it can cause [[stat zero]] if you are unable to remove it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Desirability== | ||
| + | Gaining a little more strength rarely ever has a very dramatic effect on your character's performances. It provides a slight increase to your accuracy and damage output, and it allows you to wear armour, [[shield]]s, and [[large shield]]s more effectively, but its overall impact is usually pretty negligible. A +5 or +6 strength ring might be a good find for early characters wearing heavy armour or a shield, particularly if they also intend to cast spells, but you'll probably want to replace this with something better eventually. | ||
[[Category:Ring]] | [[Category:Ring]] | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 22 April 2015
Version 0.16: This article may not be up to date for the latest stable release of Crawl.
| Type | Jewellery |
|---|---|
| Name | Ring of strength |
| Icon | 
|
A ±X ring of strength affects the strength of the wearer by X (ranges from +6 to -6). If X is negative, the ring is normally cursed, and it can cause stat zero if you are unable to remove it.
Desirability
Gaining a little more strength rarely ever has a very dramatic effect on your character's performances. It provides a slight increase to your accuracy and damage output, and it allows you to wear armour, shields, and large shields more effectively, but its overall impact is usually pretty negligible. A +5 or +6 strength ring might be a good find for early characters wearing heavy armour or a shield, particularly if they also intend to cast spells, but you'll probably want to replace this with something better eventually.
