Difference between revisions of "Talk:Constriction"
(Noting partial page update) |
m (Removed "in progress" information.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST) | :Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to [[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] for updating the article. I put the list of monsters [[Held|here]]. -- [[User:Derrek|Derrek]] ([[User talk:Derrek|talk]]) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
| − | + | Finished page update. --[[User:Wwf|Wwf]] ([[User talk:Wwf|talk]]) 09:50, 23 March 2022 (CET) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 09:50, 23 March 2022
I don't remember tentacled starspawn, snaplasher vines, or either standard or inept mimics being able to actually deal constriction damage. If I recall correctly, those all inflict the Held condition instead (I might be wrong on the starspawn and vines, though; it's been a while since I've run into either). --spudwalt (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (CEST)
- Sorry, I was not aware of this. I was thinking it was called Constriction even with zero damage over time. Thanks to MoogleDan for updating the article. I put the list of monsters here. -- Derrek (talk) 18:09, 1 May 2014 (CEST)
Finished page update. --Wwf (talk) 09:50, 23 March 2022 (CET)
