Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Spellcaster"
Ion frigate (talk | contribs) (Created page with "What do people think of this? I can see three possible advantages to it: * It seems more bot-friendly, though it may have to be made to include HD if we want to derive spell da...") |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Anyway, do people think it's worth putting this in articles? If not, I can gladly delete this page. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 18:48, 23 January 2013 (CET) | Anyway, do people think it's worth putting this in articles? If not, I can gladly delete this page. -[[User:Ion frigate|Ion frigate]] 18:48, 23 January 2013 (CET) | ||
| + | :Y'know what, I like this. Nice work here Ion. Any arguments against adding this in? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 18:50, 23 January 2013 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 23 January 2013
What do people think of this? I can see three possible advantages to it:
- It seems more bot-friendly, though it may have to be made to include HD if we want to derive spell damages for it (I'm not sure there).
- It better shows the relative frequency of spells, i.e. that ice fiends can be expected to spam their bolts of cold at you, or that hell sentinels have a reasonable probability to use their melee spell.
- It's a little neater.
Anyway, do people think it's worth putting this in articles? If not, I can gladly delete this page. -Ion frigate 18:48, 23 January 2013 (CET)
- Y'know what, I like this. Nice work here Ion. Any arguments against adding this in? --MoogleDan 18:50, 23 January 2013 (CET)
