Difference between revisions of "Talk:Orcish Mines"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've always hated how massive pages get when we have huge stacks of monsters listed. I'm not sure how I feel about this solution though. It's not the cleanest look in the world, but I like that it doesn't make the page scroll forever. Thoughts? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 20:30, 19 July 2013 (CEST) | I've always hated how massive pages get when we have huge stacks of monsters listed. I'm not sure how I feel about this solution though. It's not the cleanest look in the world, but I like that it doesn't make the page scroll forever. Thoughts? --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] 20:30, 19 July 2013 (CEST) | ||
:I'm okay with doing it that way, though there's probably some way of making it look a little bit better. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 20:57, 19 July 2013 (CEST) | :I'm okay with doing it that way, though there's probably some way of making it look a little bit better. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] 20:57, 19 July 2013 (CEST) | ||
| + | :Hm.. maybe we could use a simple table? It isn't as clear as I would like it right now. --[[User:Lokkij|Lokkij]] 21:01, 19 July 2013 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 20:01, 19 July 2013
I've always hated how massive pages get when we have huge stacks of monsters listed. I'm not sure how I feel about this solution though. It's not the cleanest look in the world, but I like that it doesn't make the page scroll forever. Thoughts? --MoogleDan 20:30, 19 July 2013 (CEST)
- I'm okay with doing it that way, though there's probably some way of making it look a little bit better. --spudwalt 20:57, 19 July 2013 (CEST)
- Hm.. maybe we could use a simple table? It isn't as clear as I would like it right now. --Lokkij 21:01, 19 July 2013 (CEST)
