Difference between revisions of "Talk:Barding"
DC Malleus (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What do people think: should we merge both the [[naga barding]] and [[centaur barding]] pages with this one? Really, the two types of barding are functionally identical, apart from fitting different species and having different unrands. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 23:00, 20 May 2014 (CEST) | What do people think: should we merge both the [[naga barding]] and [[centaur barding]] pages with this one? Really, the two types of barding are functionally identical, apart from fitting different species and having different unrands. [[User:Spudwalt|--spudwalt]] ([[User talk:Spudwalt|talk]]) 23:00, 20 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
:Personally, I like giving them separate pages, but that's just my sense of completionism kicking in. I personally vote for continuing to keep them separate, but wouldn't throw a hissy fit if I got outvoted. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 01:50, 21 May 2014 (CEST) | :Personally, I like giving them separate pages, but that's just my sense of completionism kicking in. I personally vote for continuing to keep them separate, but wouldn't throw a hissy fit if I got outvoted. --[[User:MoogleDan|MoogleDan]] ([[User talk:MoogleDan|talk]]) 01:50, 21 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
| + | :Until they are treated the same programmatically I think it is fair to keep separate pages for both and rely on categories to manage the relationship between them. [[User:DC Malleus|DC Malleus]] ([[User talk:DC Malleus|talk]]) 02:01, 21 May 2014 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 21 May 2014
What do people think: should we merge both the naga barding and centaur barding pages with this one? Really, the two types of barding are functionally identical, apart from fitting different species and having different unrands. --spudwalt (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2014 (CEST)
- Personally, I like giving them separate pages, but that's just my sense of completionism kicking in. I personally vote for continuing to keep them separate, but wouldn't throw a hissy fit if I got outvoted. --MoogleDan (talk) 01:50, 21 May 2014 (CEST)
- Until they are treated the same programmatically I think it is fair to keep separate pages for both and rely on categories to manage the relationship between them. DC Malleus (talk) 02:01, 21 May 2014 (CEST)
